

Here’s a nightmare scenario for democracy: In November 2020, COVID-19 is still a major threat, whether as the lingering effects of the pandemic we see now or a likely second wave, forcing state and local leaders to make an impossible choice between holding the elections and risking the health of millions, or canceling them and risking democracy itself.
Universal voting by mail, which is already conducted in several states by millions of people, seems like the obvious solution. People who are against this idea, such as the President of the United States (who voted by absentee in the last election), make the counterargument that voting by mail invites fraud.
Who is right?
There’s two ways of answering that question. First, there’s what an overwhelming amount of evidence actually tells us, or “factual truth.” But then there’s what people feel is true, despite all of the evidence. That’s “emotional truth,” or in the words of Stephen Colbert, “truthiness.”
In this case, as in so many others, factual truth and emotional truth are at odds.
The factual truth about universal vote-by-mail is that it works and it’s pretty safe from fraud. Colorado, Utah, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii all conduct most or all of their elections by mail. Oregon has been doing so since 1998. Cases of fraud have been incredibly rare.
That’s the actual, factual truth. That’s reality.
But somehow, for some people, it doesn’t feel true at all.
I’ve been thinking about why that is. I think part of it is that because voting fraud is so rare that when it does happen, it tends to make the news and become a big story. Think about the Bridgeport absentee ballot controversy that happened last year, in which Bridgeport mayor and felon Joe Ganim narrowly lost the machine vote in his primary with Sen. Marilyn Moore, D-Bridgeport, but overwhelmingly won the absentee ballots to put him over the top. In the days following, Hearst Connecticut did some digging and found absentee voters who felt pressured to vote for Ganim, voters who didn’t remember requesting an absentee ballot, and plenty of errors in the city records. That was a big deal, even though a judge eventually decided that there wasn’t enough evidence to re-run the election.
Does that mean that absentee ballots or general voting by mail is crooked?
Man, it sure feels like it. It’s not hard to picture political operatives “helping” the sick and the elderly fill out their ballots to harvest votes for their candidate. The scenario that I worry about is a domineering family member intercepting ballots and filling them out for everyone in a household, or standing over someone as they fill theirs out.
These are lurid images. The secret ballot is vital to democracy, and voting by mail seems to invite all kinds of ways to undermine that.
But the evidence we have suggests it doesn’t happen. Maybe we need better evidence! Or maybe we need to listen to the experiences of the states where voting by mail is routine, and understand that there are ways to make this process more secure.
Better records would be a start. But so would easy ways for election officials to compare signatures on ballots to signatures on, say, state IDs. If someone does need help filling out a ballot, a nonpartisan election official could be that person. Campaign workers should never be allowed to check out dozens of ballots and deliver them to voters, as was the case in Bridgeport.
States should be investigating all-mail voting seriously, and finding out what it would take to transition to this kind of an election in time for November. It’s either that or risk an election debacle like what happened recently in Wisconsin. At least 50 people who worked at the polls or voted in that election have since been diagnosed with COVID-19.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
But states should also be working to reassure the public that voting through the mail is safe. It is true, but it also has to feel true. Otherwise, we could be facing an election that voters feel isn’t legitimate, and that won’t end anywhere good.
Susan Bigelow is an award-winning columnist and the founder of CTLocalPolitics. She lives in Enfield with her wife and their cats.
DISCLAIMER: The views, opinions, positions, or strategies expressed by the author are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or positions of CTNewsJunkie.com.
More COVID-19 Coverage

Connecticut To Get FEMA Funds for COVID Testing Sites
Connecticut will receive more than $2 million in federal emergency funding to pay for the operation of COVID-19 testing sites during a six-month period last year, the Federal Emergency Management Agency announced Monday. The roughly $2.15 million will come from FEMA’s public assistance grant program and will be used to reimburse state funds used to…
Keep reading
COVID Transmission Increases in CT
As of Friday afternoon, Connecticut’s test positivity rate was 13.71% and there were 323 residents hospitalized with the virus. On Thursday, the Department of Public Health reported that 158 of Connecticut’s 169 municipalities qualified for the state’s “red alert” distinction for COVID-19, which is triggered when a community records at least 15 daily cases per…
Keep reading
Connecticut At High, Medium Risk of COVID Transmission
Connecticut’s COVID-19 test positivity rating was 10.35% on Thursday and all eight Connecticut counties were in the medium yellow or high orange categories on the CDC’s community spread map. Those community maps, created by the CDC in February, are supposed to tell people to take preventative steps such as masking and testing. Hartford, Middlesex and…
Keep reading
Advocates Make 11th Hour Pitch For Compassionate Release
Hartford, CT — Advocates seeking compassionate release from prison during public health emergencies like COVID rallied at the state Capitol hours before they saw their legislation die without action in either chamber. At the rally on Wednesday, protestors and advocates were demanding action from legislators to pass a bill that addresses COVID in prisons. The…
Keep reading
Legislating During COVID-19
The legislative session ends in three days now, that’s shorter than the amount of time someone should quarantine under CDC standards if they have COVID-19, so how are lawmakers coping? Sen. Saud Anwar, D-South Windsor, started experiencing symptoms two weeks ago and tested positive for COVID-19. Luckily the session wasn’t scheduled until last Tuesday, but…
Keep reading
Study Shows Union Nursing Homes Had Lower Rates of COVID-19
A recent study published by Health Affairs found that unionized nursing homes had lower resident COVID-19 mortality rates. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing home residents have accounted for roughly one of every six COVID-19 deaths in the United States. Nursing homes have also been very dangerous places for workers, with more than…
Keep reading
Senator Murphy Tests Positive For COVID
U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy announced on Twitter that he tested positive for COVID-19. “FYI after feeling mild symptoms overnight, I tested positive for COVID this morning. We’ve done the contact tracing and let people know. It’s a bummer, but I’m sure if I wasn’t fully vaccinated I would be feeling a lot worse. So remember…
Keep reading
COVID Cases Tick Back Up
Most of Gov. Ned Lamont’s executive orders, which were extended to April 15 by the legislature, have now expired just as Connecticut’s test positivity rate for COVID-19 is creeping back up and students at UConn are being asked to mask up again, starting today. According to the Department of Public Health, Connecticut recorded 3,939 positive…
Keep reading
House Green Lights Extension of COVID-19 Laws
The House gave final passage Wednesday to a package of four concepts that had been executive orders and are now law. Previously, the concepts were executive orders to address the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keep reading
Tong Tests Positive For COVID-19
Attorney General William Tong has tested positive for COVID-19. He is experiencing mild symptoms and quarantining at home.
Keep reading
Lieutenant Gov. Tests Positive For COVID-19, Days After Gov
Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz tested positive for the COVID-19 virus during a routine rapid test over the weekend, her chief staff said in a Monday morning statement. Bysiewicz’s results follow Gov. Ned Lamont, who tested positive late last week. “I have tested positive for COVID-19,” Bysiewicz wrote on Twitter. “Thanks to the vaccine and booster…
Keep reading
Lamont Tests Positive for COVID-19
Gov. Ned Lamont tested positive for COVID-19 Thursday. The results from two rapid tests were positive and he’s awaiting the results of a PCR test, according to this staff. The 68-year-old governor received his second booster exactly a week ago, but has made it through the first two years of the pandemic without contracting the…
Keep reading
New Initiative Allows Same Day COVID Testing And Treatment
Hundreds of pharmacies and federally qualified community health centers across Connecticut are now offering COVID testing and treatments to patients at the same time and place. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, these test-to-treat sites provide antiviral medication to hundreds of locations across the U.S, who then distribute them to patients…
Keep reading
YNHH Top Doc Boosts 2nd Boosters
If you’re eligible to get a second Covid-19 booster shot, go get it. Especially if you’re over 50 and have an underlying medical condition like diabetes that puts you at “high risk” of contracting a severe case of COVID. Read more from the New Haven Independent.
Keep reading
Federal COVID Funds To Limit Tax Relief In An Election Year
Like all states, Connecticut accepted billions of dollars from the federal government for COVID-19 relief, but that money limits how much the state can now consider cutting taxes. It’s bubbling up as a point of contention as lawmakers race to adjust the two-year state budget, which is currently experiencing a record surplus. Connecticut is expected…
Keep reading