
More than 2,000 people traveled Monday to the state Capitol for an all-day public hearing on gun regulations that was scheduled as a response to the Newtown murders. Most asked lawmakers not to pass stricter gun control laws.
Early in the day, a line stretched around the Legislative Office Building as members of the public waited in the snow to pass through metal detectors set up by the Capitol police. Officers manning the metal detectors reported no unusual incidents and said no one attempted to bring firearms into the building.
In the morning, lawmakers heard from some of the families of the Sandy Hook victims, some of whom argued for additional gun restriction. They also took testimony from several representatives of gun manufacturing companies who warned against passing gun control legislation that they didn’t believe would make the state any safer.
In the afternoon, lawmakers began to hear from the several thousand residents who risked the wintry roads to testify before the committee. While positions varied, members of the public primarily argued against the implementation of more restrictions on gun owners.
Christopher Yen, of Norwalk, told lawmakers it was “common sense” that assault weapon bans don’t work, as they have been tried before. A federal law banned assault weapons from 1994 to 2004.
“These laws simply didn’t prevent mass violence. Columbine. Connecticut Lottery. The bans did nothing to prevent them, committed with weapons fully compliant with those laws. For me the simple perception is these laws don’t work,” he said.
Like most of the pro-gun speakers to testify, Yen got a round of applause from the audience as he finished speaking.

The audience continued applauding despite several requests by lawmakers, who are accustomed to orderly hearings, to refrain from reacting to testimony. Early in the hearing Senate President Donald Williams urged the people in the hearing room to stop clapping, talking, or laughing during testimony.
“We would like to proceed in an atmosphere in this room where folks are respectful,” Williams said. “I would appreciate it actually if going forward . . . if folks refrain from reacting, from commenting, and even from applauding.”
One woman in the room responded to his request by shouting “We’re humans!”
As lawmakers made their way through a several-page list of the thousands who had signed up to testify, people waiting to speak stood in the halls of the Legislative Office Building, or in a number of overflow hearing rooms, where the proceedings were playing on closed-caption television.
Paul Elsenboss of Woodbury was waiting out in the hall. He said he has been a National Rifle Association member since he was 14 years old.
Elsenboss said that he began teaching his kids gun safety when they were around the age of three by showing them Eddie Eagle, a children’s movie created by the NRA. He was skeptical of what he had heard so far from lawmakers.
“A lot of stuff they’re proposing won’t make a difference. It’s about respect and gun awareness more than anything,” he said. “The kids I meet through shooting have respect and responsibility, they are some of the nicest people you will ever meet.”

For some, like Matt Keller of Madison, an ideal solution would include a ban on assault weapons. A proposal that prompted a rebuttal from gun advocate Mauriello Phillips who was standing nearby.
“I go by the constitution,” he said.
Keller said gun safety legislation and the 2nd Amendment are not mutually exclusive.
“Both actually are compatible, and for a sane and safe society you can have reasonable restrictions without infringing on the rights of gun owners,” Keller said “You can have reasonable restrictions and gun ownership, which is perfectly compatible with safety. So, I’m not out to ban anybody’s rights on weapons but I would like to see some sane legislation.”
Back in the hearing room lawmakers heard from a few members of the public who agreed. Kimberly Oryell, of South Windsor, brought a photo of her uncle, Jerry, who was murdered in North Carolina.
She asked the committee to act not just to prevent more mass shootings, but the violent crime that occurs every day. She said mass murders are typically committed by people who pass a background check because they have no criminal history.
“Street crime, however, is most usually committed by those who have previous criminal offenses and did not obtain a weapon through legal means, as is the case with the ex-convict who shot my uncle in a dark parking lot,” she said.
Oryell called for regulations prohibiting a gun in the home of a person with a mental illness. She also called for a law requiring a permit to possess a rifle.
“To say handguns should be subject to scrutiny but rifles should not is absurd. If a weapon can shoot a bullet then it will be deadly in the wrong hands,” she said.
But a vast majority of those who testified were of the opinion of John Barry, who told lawmakers that “only in Connecticut would a massacre of innocents result in a tax proposal.” Barry was referring to legislation by Sen. Beth Bye, D-West Hartford, which would place a tax on ammunition.

In his testimony, Barry laid out justification for owning several different types of artillery. Some of the gun control advocates who testified questioned why civilians would ever need to own assault rifles.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
“Why do we need so called assault rifles in a civilized society? I watched people on TV after Hurricane Katrina talk about pickup trucks full of thugs stopping at the end of their driveways,” Barry said.
There are 91 pieces of legislation this year seeking to tighten gun laws, according to Robert Crook, director of the Coalition of Connecticut Sportsmen.
Crook observed that there were more pro-gun advocates at the hearing Monday than the opposition.
But Betty Gallo, a lobbyist for Connecticut Against Gun Violence, said she was heartened by the 100 advocates who turned out to testify in favor of strengthening Connecticut’s gun laws. Gallo said the National Rifle Association has a long history of being able to turn people out for hearings.
Megan Merrigan and Christine Stuart contributed to this report.
Related

OP-ED | Students Need To Feel Safe
Since the Oxford High School shooting in Michigan, thousands of students in Connecticut have been terrorized by threats of violence in school, leading to lockdowns, school closures and widespread, student absences across the state.
Keep reading
Sandy Hook Families Say Remington Bankruptcy An Attempt To Avoid Lawsuit
The families of nine victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shootings are viewing Tuesday’s bankruptcy filing by Remington Arms Co. as an attempt to shield the company from their pending lawsuit in Connecticut Superior Court. The families are suing the company which manufactured the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting that killed 20 children…
Keep reading
Best Way To Spend $25M to Curb Gun Violence Discussed
WEST HAVEN, CT – How to most effectively use new federal funding to attack three areas of gun violence in Connecticut and nationally brought advocates to a weekend forum at the University of New Haven. U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro joined community leaders, law enforcement officials and healthcare providers to brainstorm leveraging the money to address…
Keep reading
Lamont Comes To Guilford To Tout Passage of Safe Gun Storage Law
GUILFORD, CT — Even though he’s already signed gun safe storage legislation, Gov. Ned Lamont felt it was important to come to Guilford on Thursday to recognize those who fought so hard to make the law reality. “Ethan’s Law” — which would require all firearms, loaded and unloaded, to be safely stored in homes occupied…
Keep readingBlumenthal, Murphy Seek Repeal of Law Shielding Gun Industry From Consumer Negligence Lawsuits
WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy have introduced legislation to rescind a 2005 law that has blocked most negligence and product liability cases from being filed against gun manufacturers, distributors and dealers in state or federal courts. The threat of negligence and product liability lawsuits will provide “a powerful incentive” for safer…
Keep reading
Murphy Continues Call for Gun Safety Votes
WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Chris Murphy is continuing to push Senate Republican leaders to debate universal background-check legislation that passed the House nearly 100 days ago. The Connecticut Democrat who has championed gun safety legislation since the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in December 2012, spoke on the Senate floor and at a press conference…
Keep reading
Winners And Losers of the 2019 Legislative Session
HARTFORD, CT — The regular General Assembly session is over so it’s time to take a look back at some of the big winners and losers of a session highlighted by the inauguration of a new governor and a legislature with a strong Democratic bent. That Democratic majority helped carry through some party priorities to…
Keep reading
Ethan’s Law On Its Way To Governor’s Desk
HARTFORD, CT —(Updated 7:15 p.m.)“Ethan’s Law” – which would require all firearms, loaded and unloaded, to be safely stored in homes occupied by minors under 18 years of age – easily passed the Senate Thursday with bipartisan support. Only two Republicans, Sens. Rob Sampson of Wolcott and John Kissel of Enfield, voted against the bill.…
Keep reading
‘Ethan’s Law’ Introduced In Congress
WASHINGTON – Connecticut lawmakers announced Tuesday that they have introduced a federal version of “Ethan’s Law” in the House and Senate modeled after legislation nearing passage in the Connecticut to require gun owners to safely store their weapons away from children. Mike and Kristin Song of Guilford, whose son Ethan was killed by an accidental…
Keep reading
House Passes Gun Storage Law with Bipartisan Support
HARTFORD, CT — “Ethan’s Law” — which would require all firearms, loaded and unloaded, to be safely stored in homes occupied by minors under 18 years of age — easily passed the House on Tuesday with bipartisan support. The bill, which passed by a 127-16 vote, would allow prosecutors to criminally charge the owner of…
Keep reading