

Participating in public hearings of the Connecticut legislature, especially when it seems like many legislators do not care to understand what issues citizens are facing, is often a frustrating experience. For the last several years, hearings have been held over Zoom and we have participated from our homes and offices rather than gathering in rooms at the legislative office building. Unfortunately, we still observe elected representatives grandstanding and showing a disregard for public input.
On March 14, the Judiciary Committee held a public hearing on several youth justice bills and on gun legislation. Two hundred and twenty-seven people signed up to testify. At three minutes per person, the hearing could have been expected to last more than eleven hours, even if legislators on the committee asked no questions and made no comments, and everyone who was on the list delivered their testimony.
A public hearing is supposed to be about hearing from the public regarding their input on the bills on the committee’s agenda. However, it appears that some legislators, rather than making an effort to listen to understand the issues being brought forward, instead use their time to cross-examine and discredit any constituent whose life experience or opinion varies from their own. During the day, a few legislators used a number of tactics such as drilling down on whether someone understood some very technical nature buried in a particular bill, asking if that person had ever been incarcerated, and if so for what, and pushing back on people based on their age, as if being young should disqualify someone from having a voice. In one example, one representative used extreme fearmongering, asking what the person believed should happen to a hypothetical youth who committed multiple murders.
We have observed multiple legislators use these techniques in a troubling pattern during the course of this session. Holding hearings over Zoom made it easier for subject matter experts to participate in hearings even if they don’t live in the state of Connecticut. Legislators therefore had the opportunity to ask questions in real-time of people who “know their stuff.” However, too often, we’ve seen legislators ask not even a single question of people who have the answers, but instead ask very nuanced questions of community members, many of whom are testifying in front of a legislature for the very first time.
What are they proving by such actions? The approach is very effective if the goal is to make sure the legislator creates a soundbite that they can use in an advertisement come election time or to put on their social media for their constituents who aren’t watching the actual hearings so that the legislator can say that they are “tough on crime” or “protecting the way of life” in their town. It’s a performance, and it may appeal to certain parts of the electorate. But for those of us who are trying to advance substantive policy discussions, or address root problems, it’s an exercise in frustration.
Other elected officials take a different approach. When members of the public who agree with their position come before the committee, some legislators engage each one in lengthy conversations, repeating the same talking points throughout the day, with nothing new being added to the discussion. As a result, the hearing that started at 10:00 am dragged on into the night with many potential speakers dropping off.
Whether the motivation is to score points for reelection, to discourage others from speaking up, or simply to discount the peoples’ testimony is irrelevant. The result is the same. Legislators are not listening, and that is contrary to what the Connecticut General Assembly website would lead us to believe: “Your elected state legislators want to know what you think of proposed legislation before they vote on it. You can telephone them or write them letters to express your views. Another effective way of getting your point across is speaking at a public hearing.” Speaking at a public hearing when legislators are not listening (or are – as usually happens – in multiple hearings or meetings simultaneously) does not feel effective. At least when hearings were held in person at the building, you could see how many legislators were physically present in the room. Now, you have to look for faces in boxes on the screen and hope that some of them are paying attention.
Let us be clear. The public wants to be heard. 227 members of the public signed up to speak that day. The representatives and senators can debate the issues and share their views in other settings. The behavior of some elected officials during public hearings makes a mockery of the public hearing process and does a disservice to the public, the other legislators on the committee, and to democracy.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
Neither of us are elected officials. We want to acknowledge the time and effort that members of the legislature, all of whom sit on multiple committees, put forward to serve their constituents and all of the residents of the state of Connecticut in the best way that they know how. What we are asking is that you consider doing your jobs a little differently during public hearings. Engage with the public in good faith. Ask questions to understand, rather than ensure that your point of view is understood. Public hearings are for you to hear from us, the public. Please know that for members of the public, taking the time to write testimony, sign up for a public hearing, and wait to testify is its own way of service. If you want us to respect you, you need to show that same respect to us.
More COVID-19 Coverage

Connecticut To Get FEMA Funds for COVID Testing Sites
Connecticut will receive more than $2 million in federal emergency funding to pay for the operation of COVID-19 testing sites during a six-month period last year, the Federal Emergency Management Agency announced Monday. The roughly $2.15 million will come from FEMA’s public assistance grant program and will be used to reimburse state funds used to…
Keep reading
COVID Transmission Increases in CT
As of Friday afternoon, Connecticut’s test positivity rate was 13.71% and there were 323 residents hospitalized with the virus. On Thursday, the Department of Public Health reported that 158 of Connecticut’s 169 municipalities qualified for the state’s “red alert” distinction for COVID-19, which is triggered when a community records at least 15 daily cases per…
Keep reading
Connecticut At High, Medium Risk of COVID Transmission
Connecticut’s COVID-19 test positivity rating was 10.35% on Thursday and all eight Connecticut counties were in the medium yellow or high orange categories on the CDC’s community spread map. Those community maps, created by the CDC in February, are supposed to tell people to take preventative steps such as masking and testing. Hartford, Middlesex and…
Keep reading
Advocates Make 11th Hour Pitch For Compassionate Release
Hartford, CT — Advocates seeking compassionate release from prison during public health emergencies like COVID rallied at the state Capitol hours before they saw their legislation die without action in either chamber. At the rally on Wednesday, protestors and advocates were demanding action from legislators to pass a bill that addresses COVID in prisons. The…
Keep reading
Legislating During COVID-19
The legislative session ends in three days now, that’s shorter than the amount of time someone should quarantine under CDC standards if they have COVID-19, so how are lawmakers coping? Sen. Saud Anwar, D-South Windsor, started experiencing symptoms two weeks ago and tested positive for COVID-19. Luckily the session wasn’t scheduled until last Tuesday, but…
Keep reading
Study Shows Union Nursing Homes Had Lower Rates of COVID-19
A recent study published by Health Affairs found that unionized nursing homes had lower resident COVID-19 mortality rates. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing home residents have accounted for roughly one of every six COVID-19 deaths in the United States. Nursing homes have also been very dangerous places for workers, with more than…
Keep reading
Senator Murphy Tests Positive For COVID
U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy announced on Twitter that he tested positive for COVID-19. “FYI after feeling mild symptoms overnight, I tested positive for COVID this morning. We’ve done the contact tracing and let people know. It’s a bummer, but I’m sure if I wasn’t fully vaccinated I would be feeling a lot worse. So remember…
Keep reading
COVID Cases Tick Back Up
Most of Gov. Ned Lamont’s executive orders, which were extended to April 15 by the legislature, have now expired just as Connecticut’s test positivity rate for COVID-19 is creeping back up and students at UConn are being asked to mask up again, starting today. According to the Department of Public Health, Connecticut recorded 3,939 positive…
Keep reading
House Green Lights Extension of COVID-19 Laws
The House gave final passage Wednesday to a package of four concepts that had been executive orders and are now law. Previously, the concepts were executive orders to address the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keep reading
Tong Tests Positive For COVID-19
Attorney General William Tong has tested positive for COVID-19. He is experiencing mild symptoms and quarantining at home.
Keep reading
Lieutenant Gov. Tests Positive For COVID-19, Days After Gov
Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz tested positive for the COVID-19 virus during a routine rapid test over the weekend, her chief staff said in a Monday morning statement. Bysiewicz’s results follow Gov. Ned Lamont, who tested positive late last week. “I have tested positive for COVID-19,” Bysiewicz wrote on Twitter. “Thanks to the vaccine and booster…
Keep reading
Lamont Tests Positive for COVID-19
Gov. Ned Lamont tested positive for COVID-19 Thursday. The results from two rapid tests were positive and he’s awaiting the results of a PCR test, according to this staff. The 68-year-old governor received his second booster exactly a week ago, but has made it through the first two years of the pandemic without contracting the…
Keep reading
New Initiative Allows Same Day COVID Testing And Treatment
Hundreds of pharmacies and federally qualified community health centers across Connecticut are now offering COVID testing and treatments to patients at the same time and place. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, these test-to-treat sites provide antiviral medication to hundreds of locations across the U.S, who then distribute them to patients…
Keep reading
YNHH Top Doc Boosts 2nd Boosters
If you’re eligible to get a second Covid-19 booster shot, go get it. Especially if you’re over 50 and have an underlying medical condition like diabetes that puts you at “high risk” of contracting a severe case of COVID. Read more from the New Haven Independent.
Keep reading
Federal COVID Funds To Limit Tax Relief In An Election Year
Like all states, Connecticut accepted billions of dollars from the federal government for COVID-19 relief, but that money limits how much the state can now consider cutting taxes. It’s bubbling up as a point of contention as lawmakers race to adjust the two-year state budget, which is currently experiencing a record surplus. Connecticut is expected…
Keep reading