
A bill to allow terminally ill patients in Connecticut to end their lives through medication was dealt a blow Thursday when the Senate referred it to the Judiciary Committee, a legislative panel that lacked the votes to pass it last year.
The legislation, called aid-in-dying for terminally ill patients, cleared the Public Health Committee for the second consecutive year. Opponents of the bill objected when the public health panel made alterations to its language, apparently in hopes of avoiding a referral to the Judiciary Committee.

You can also look up you legislators here and contact them directly.
However, Senate leaders announced Thursday the bill would still need to be cleared by the legal committee in order to continue in the legislative process.
“The bill deals with the issue of legal liability and/or exemptions from such liability for physicians and with actions regarding the competency of a person to make a choice to end his or her life thus falling within the cognizance of the Judiciary Committee,” Senate President Martin Looney and Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff said in a joint statement.
With less than a month left in this year’s short session, the referral diminishes the bill’s chances of passage. It was unclear Friday whether it had support enough to advance out of the Judiciary Committee, where leaders claimed they were significantly short of enough votes to pass it last year.
In March, Sen. Gary Winfield, a New Haven Democrat who co-chairs the committee, said the dynamics of the panel had not changed. In a text Thursday Winfield, a supporter of the bill, said he was not sure if any members had been swayed.
“[W]e are working on it to see if we can get a different result,” Winfield said.
Tim Appleton, senior campaign director of Compassion and Choices, an organization that lobbies for the bill, declined to speculate Friday on whether there was enough support on the Judiciary Committee to advance the bill this year.
However, Appleton said supporters had stepped up efforts to communicate with members of the legal panel, given the bill’s fate in 2021.
“There is no question aid-in-dying will pass here in Connecticut, especially when, according to polls, 75% of people support it. That tells me some day, this bill will pass,” Appleton said. “The only question is, how many people will have to die, suffering immeasurably at end of life before that happens?”
In the past, the bill has drawn support and opposition from both sides of the aisle. Proponents argue the policy, which has been adopted in some form in 10 other states, gives dying residents a choice at the end of their lives. Opponents, including some religious organizations and people with disabilities, argue the bill endorses suicide over improvements to end of life care.
The bill is designed to apply to patients with less than six months to live and who are considered “competent” and capable of making health care decisions. It requires two doctors attest to the patient’s diagnosis and competency to make the call.
Many supporters hoped to see the bill’s success this session, which started about a month after the death of Kim Hoffman, one of Connecticut’s most vocal advocates for the policy. Hoffman died in January after a more than eight year struggle with terminal cancer.
In February, her father, Herb Hoffman, testified before the legislature and urged lawmakers to endorse the bill. He told the committee he was also suffering from terminal cancer. Shortly after the Public Health Committee advanced the proposal, Hoffman died. He had relocated to California in order to take advantage of that state’s aid-in-dying law.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
On Friday, Appleton called the elder Hoffman a “medical refugee.”
“He pulled up stakes in Connecticut and took a lonely trip out to southern California in order to access aid-in-dying because he knew he didn’t want the same journey that his daughter had just made,” Appleton said.
More about aid-in-dying

PODCAST | How Medical Aid In Dying May Change The Way We Live
Medical aid in dying offers what some may call “a good death.” But how will the increased use of it change our relationship with dying? That’s the topic of the latest episode of Audacious with Chion Wolf from Connecticut Public Radio.
Keep reading
Aid-in-Dying Bill Fails in Judiciary Committee
This year’s aid-in-dying bill was voted down Monday by the Senate half of the General Assembly’s Judiciary Committee, which divided itself in an unusual legislative maneuver before putting the policy to an unsuccessful vote. Senators on the legal panel rejected the bill, which would have allowed terminally ill patients in Connecticut to end their lives…
Keep reading
Aid-in-Dying Bill Clears Public Health Committee
For the second consecutive year, a key legislative committee endorsed a controversial bill Friday to allow terminally ill patients in Connecticut an option to end their own lives with doctor-prescribed medication. The legislation, called aid-in-dying for terminally ill patients, cleared the Public Health Committee on a 21 to 9 vote that followed an emotional public…
Keep reading
Public Hearing on Aid-in-Dying Bill Draws Moving Testimony
Connecticut lawmakers heard a procession of emotionally bruising testimony Wednesday during this year’s public hearing on legislation that would give terminally ill patients a legal option to end their own lives with doctor-prescribed medication. The concept, alternatively called aid-in-dying and assisted suicide, has been raised in some form by state legislators more than a dozen…
Keep reading
Committee To Tackle Aid-In-Dying Legislation
Lawmakers on the Public Health Committee reintroduced legislation Monday to allow terminally ill patients in Connecticut the option of using medication to end their own lives. The move rekindles a divisive and emotional issue during the short, election year session. During a morning meeting held virtually on Zoom, Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, a Westport Democrat and…
Keep reading
Without Vote, Aid-In-Dying Bill Expires
A bill allowing terminally ill patients the option of using medication to end their own lives failed to garner enough support in the legislature’s Judiciary Committee before a Tuesday deadline, effectively halting the proposal for the year.
Keep reading
OP-ED | Aid in Dying is an Uncomfortable, But Pressing Issue for Terminally Ill
Aid in dying legislation may be “uncomfortable” to talk about but that does not make it any less necessary, writes Jennifer Barahona.
Keep reading
After Emotional Debate, Committee Sends Aid-In-Dying To House
Lawmakers on the public health committee struggled Friday with a bill that allows a terminally-ill person to end their life. Lawmakers on both sides of the issue set politics aside and used their personal experience to guide them in making the decision to send the bill to the House.
Keep reading
Aid-In-Dying Bill Back For Hearing Friday
Connecticut lawmakers will hear public testimony Friday on a bill giving terminally ill patients the option to take doctor-prescribed medication to end their own lives. Public hearings on similar bills have elicited emotional testimony both for and against the proposal in prior legislative sessions. Despite repeated attempts by proponents, the bill has yet to pass…
Keep reading
Public Health Committee Eyes Controversial Agenda
HARTFORD, CT — The legislature’s Public Health Committee tabled one controversial issue and raised another during one of its first meetings of the session Wednesday. “When we get to the controversy I don’t want anyone to say we didn’t follow a good process,” Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport, said. Steinberg co-chairs the committee and believes it…
Keep reading
Advocates Want More Progress On Mental Health Parity
HARTFORD – Advocates say passage of 2019’s Mental Health Parity bill represented great progress in the battle for increased mental health access and insurance coverage for those afflicted throughout Connecticut, but it’s not enough. That’s what state Rep. Sean Scanlon, co-chairman of the Insurance and Real Estate Committee, stressed at a press conference Tuesday when…
Keep reading
Public Health Committee Will Tackle Aid-In-Dying And Pregnancy Centers
HARTFORD, CT — Despite the skepticism from some of its members the Public Health Committee voted Friday to raise two controversial issues: aid-in-dying and pregnancy center advertising. The committee voted 12-9 to draft aid-in-dying legislation and 14-7 to draft the pregnancy center bill. Four members were absent. Several members of the committee said they’ve already…
Keep reading
Public Health Delays Raising Aid-In-Dying, Pregnancy Center Legislation
HARTFORD, CT — The Public Health Committee decided again Monday to postpone a vote on whether to raise a bill that would allow terminally ill patients to end their lives and another that would seek to regulate pregnancy center advertising. Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport, who co-chairs the Public Health Committee, said they held the aid-in-dying…
Keep reading
Aid-In-Dying Fails To Get A Vote
HARTFORD, CT—Connecticut will not be one of the state’s to adopt aid-in-dying legislation as its chief proponent threw in the towel Monday, not allowing the bill to come up for vote in front of the Public Health Committee. “We just didn’t have the votes,” Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport, co-chair of the committee said. He said…
Keep reading
Bill Regulating Pregnancy Centers Advances, Aid-In-Dying Is Held
HARTFORD, CT — The Public Health Committee forwarded to the House a controversial bill Friday that would regulate advertising for crisis pregnancy centers, but it held legislation that would allow terminally ill patients to end their lives with medication. Crisis pregnancy centers provide pregnancy-related services and support, but do not offer abortions or emergency contraception…
Keep reading
Future of Aid-In-Dying Bill Uncertain
HARTFORD, CT — Later this week the Public Health Committee may or may not debate legislation that would allow a terminally ill patient with six months to live to take their own life. Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport, said he doesn’t know yet if he has the votes. If he finds that he does have the…
Keep reading