

The world is watching the former Soviet Union, as a years-long conflict between Ukraine and Russia threatens to flare up into open warfare again. In 2014, Russia sent troops into the Crimean Peninsula and annexed the region. While there has been low-level fighting in the region ever since, things took a dramatic turn in December when US officials announced that Russia was staging nearly 175,000 troops and other military equipment near the Ukrainian border in preparation for a possible invasion.
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), a military alliance of 30 nations spanning North America and Europe, has been steadfast in its insistence that Russia stand down and remove its troops from the border. Instead, Russia has increased its troop presence in the region, staging troops in nearby Belarus in recent weeks.
At the heart of the conflict is Ukraine’s potential membership in NATO. Russia sees Ukrainian membership as an unacceptable threat on its border and is demanding that both Ukraine and NATO promise to never join forces. On the other hand, is the United States and NATO, who state that every nation has a right to self-determination and that it’s up to Ukraine to decide whether it joins or not.
Even as tough talk flies in all directions, President Biden has stated again and again that no US troops will be sent to Ukraine. Instead, NATO’s strategy is to supply Ukraine with weapons and, in the case of a Russian invasion, to inflict severe economic sanctions on Russia. The promise to keep American soldiers home hasn’t eased the tensions, and war between Russia and Ukraine is looking more likely each day.
While I take President Biden at his word that he’s not planning to send US troops to Ukraine right now, I’m skeptical that this will remain the case in the future. A Russian invasion of Ukraine, or even a Russian standdown, doesn’t resolve the fundamental issue: Ukraine’s alignment and its position between the western alliance and Russia. If a peaceful solution is found now, is there any guarantee that we won’t end up back here in a few years?
Unfortunately, this question does not have an easy answer. NATO members Denmark, Spain, France, and the Netherlands have already sent more military forces into eastern Europe. US officials also are considering sending more forces into the Baltic states. The response is more escalation, which will make conflict more likely. The more soldiers there are and the closer they are to Russia, the more likely it becomes that mistakes and misunderstandings can spiral into armed conflict.
If a direct conflict between Russia and NATO occurred, the impact would be felt all over the world – even here in Connecticut. Connecticut’s National Guard would almost certainly play a part in the conflict, as it did during the Iraq War. From 2003 to 2013, Connecticut-based National Guard units were constantly deployed overseas. These are our family and friends who spent significant time in harm’s way. I know several soldiers who deployed to Iraq. Many of them went multiple times, some of them faced combat and a few suffered life-changing injuries.
It worries me to think that they could be placed in the same kind of danger again. I don’t trust the assurances from political leaders that US troops won’t be headed to Ukraine, because it’s not just about the current crisis. As long as there are soldiers on both sides of the line, there’s the possibility that people I know and love will have guns pointed at them.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
All people everywhere deserve to live in peace, without the threat of a regional hegemon carving their home into pieces and gobbling them up, or leaders far past the age of military service sending them to die on Cold War battlefields. The urge to dominate and control motivates both a massive military alliance and a massive military build-up. That urge is the true enemy, and to ensure that peace reigns, Russia must stand down and NATO needs to re-evaluate its constant push for expansion. The only way to ensure that soldiers from Connecticut to Kiev are safe is for everyone to put their guns down.
More from Jamil Ragland

OP-ED | The Past Isn’t Even Past
As I read the range of reactions to Kyle Rittenhouse’s acquittal on all charges a few weeks ago, two words kept replaying over and over in my head: Bleeding Kansas.
Keep reading
OP-ED | AUKUS, Weapon Plans Signal Nuclear Escalation in US-China Tensions
What do Groton, Connecticut, and Adelaide, Australia, have in common? Soon, both will be home to one of the United States’ most guarded secrets: nuclear submarine technology.
Keep reading
OP-ED | Are We Already in a General Strike?
Jamil Ragland says there’s plenty of evidence – note the “Now Hiring” signs hanging in windows all across the state – to suggest that workers have seized the initiative in dictating the terms of their return.
Keep reading
OP-ED | Is This How Democracy is Supposed to Work?
Jamil Ragland says the coup attempt against the federal government on Jan. 6 and a whole lot of “democratic backsliding” has him asking whether this is the way democracy is supposed to work.
Keep reading
OP-ED | ‘Your Paperwork Is All Set’
On April 21, I lost my job. It happened without warning. One day, I’d been making plans for the activities I was going to enjoy with my son during the summer, and the next, I no longer had a paycheck.
Keep reading
OP-ED | We Are Overdue For A New Constitutional Convention
Jamil Ragland says he genuinely thinks that our form of government is in serious trouble.
Keep reading
OP-ED | Every Woman I’ve Ever Spoken to Long Enough Has a Story About Violence They’ve Experienced
When I saw the poster declaring that Kaisia Williams was missing, the first thing I thought was that there must be a man who knows where she is.
Keep reading
OP-ED | So What Exactly is the Point of Our State Government?
Jamil Ragland ponders how we can call our government’s response a success when 8,000 Connecticut residents have lost their lives to COVID-19 while the entire nation of South Korea lost less than 2,000.
Keep reading