
HARTFORD, CT– Legislation counting incarcerated people as members of the voting districts where they lived prior to imprisonment received final passage from the House Wednesday, sending the proposal to Gov. Ned Lamont for consideration before lawmakers begin remapping the districts this year.
The bill, which passed the House 95 to 49, will require the state to adjust population data from the U.S. Census to record inmates as members of their home communities when it redraws the lines of voting districts to ensure each has equal representation.

The proposal seeks to correct a practice commonly referred to by opponents as “prison gerrymandering” because it effectively reduces the political influence of the largely Black and brown cities where many incarcerated people are from, and inflates the representation of typically smaller towns where prisons are often located.
Rep. Daniel Fox, a Stamford Democrat who is co-chairman of the Government Administration and Elections Committee, said that less than 20% of Connecticut’s population lived in Bridgeport, Hartford, New Britain, New Haven, Stamford, or Waterbury. But more than half of its incarcerated population hailed from those six cities.
“This bill is about empowering incarcerated individuals to have political representation [in] the community where they come from and they will likely return,” Fox said.
The concept, which has been considered by the legislature for years, had a greater urgency this year as the Reapportionment Committee prepares to redraw the lines of Connecticut’s voting districts to reflect the U.S. Census population count.

Rep. Jillian Gilchrest, a West Hartford Democrat who is a teacher, said students in her introductory political science course often point to the current law as a system that “uses those without power to gain power.”
“We have a once-in-a-decade opportunity to make a change for the better here in the state,” Gilchrest said.
The House adopted an amendment, approved last week by the Senate, that requires that inmates who are in prison without the chance of release will continue to be counted where they are incarcerated.
However, unlike the bill’s passage through the Senate, where all but one lawmaker supported the measure, Republicans almost universally opposed it in the House. Only Rep. Gale Mastrofrancesco, the ranking Republican on the GAE Committee, voted with Democrats to approve the bill.

Republicans unsuccessfully attempted to further amend the proposal to count inmates in the town where they are incarcerated if they were from out-of-state or were homeless prior to being locked up. Rep. Kurt Vail, a Stafford Republican whose district includes two prisons in Somers, said those inmates will no longer be represented by anyone.
“They’re going to be in my district, perhaps, perhaps somebody else’s district and we’re telling them, just because they came from another state or they’re homeless, that they have no representation,” Vail said.
House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora said the bill “devalued” some people by leaving them without representation.
“What the state of Connecticut is setting as a policy right now is saying, ‘You don’t count in our state, you don’t exist,’ and that’s a strange thing to me,” Candelora said.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
In a press release, Secretary of the State Denise Merrill lauded the bill’s passage and said it would result in more accurate population counts in the state’s major cities and towns where prisons are located.
“Going forward, Connecticut’s legislative districts will fairly and accurately reflect the communities from which they are drawn,” Merrill said. “I applaud the legislature for passing this critical, timely bill in advance of the reapportionment of legislative districts, based on the decennial census, that will begin this fall.”
Related

OP-ED | How Much Does It Matter if a Legislator Lives Outside Their District?
Susan Bigelow unpacks the dustup over a state representative’s living quarters – and what was done to protect her incumbency.
Keep reading
OP-ED | 3 Things the Legislature Probably Won’t Focus On, But Should
Susan Bigelow lays out the issues the General Assembly ought to take up during the short session that starts Wednesday.
Keep reading
Final Map Is Closer To Democratic Proposal
A special master charged with remapping Connecticut’s five congressional districts fulfilled his court-ordered task Tuesday and submitted a plan that balances the districts’ populations while making as few changes as possible to their current boundaries. In a 44-page report to the state Supreme Court, Stanford University professor Nathaniel Persily offered a redistricting map which largely…
Keep reading
Lawmakers Fail to Reach Last-Minute Compromise on Redistricting
The future of Connecticut’s congressional districts is back in the hands of a court-appointed special master after a last-minute appeal for compromise this week among legislative Democrats and Republicans failed to produce results. The once-a-decade task of redrawing the boundaries of Connecticut’s five congressional districts wound up in the state Supreme Court’s purview late-last year…
Keep reading
Special Master Urges Commission to Make One Last Attempt at a Congressional Map
A court-appointed special master invited members of Connecticut’s bipartisan redistricting panel Monday to make one last attempt at negotiating the lines of new congressional districts. Last month, the state Supreme Court assigned the special master, Stanford University professor Nathaniel Persily, to draft a plan to ensure each of the state’s five congressional districts have an…
Keep readingSpecial Master Weighs Modest Changes To Congressional Districts
Following a snow delay, a court-appointed special master will hear testimony Monday from Democrats and Republicans on proposed redistricting maps which largely preserve the boundaries of Connecticut’s five congressional districts. The special master, Nathaniel Persily, was assigned by the state Supreme Court in late December after the legislature’s bipartisan Reapportionment Commission failed to come to…
Keep reading
Missed Deadlines, Outside Pressure Thwart Congressional Maps
As Connecticut’s bipartisan redistricting panel missed a court-extended deadline Tuesday members from both parties said the outside pressure of national politics had complicated their efforts to adjust the lines of the state’s five congressional districts.
Keep reading
Redistricting Commission Tells Court They Aren’t At An Impasse
Facing an already-prolonged deadline next week, Connecticut’s redistricting committee sought Wednesday to delay compliance with a state Supreme Court order that it propose candidates to supervise negotiations of a new congressional district map. The bipartisan Reapportionment Commission’s request was included in an update to the court late Wednesday. The process of adjusting the state’s five…
Keep reading