

A total of 44 states and the District of Columbia had announced by late last week that public schools will remain closed for the rest of the school year because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Connecticut was not one of them – yet.
Schools are still closed until further notice pending an announcement on May 20, per Gov. Ned Lamont’s executive order, but it’s highly unlikely that students and teachers will see the inside of classrooms before next school year.
Connecticut Education Association President Jeff Leake, for one, urges caution regarding the re-opening, whenever it happens: “Before we send students, teachers, and staff back to school, the state must develop and implement new procedures and protocols to keep them safe. Schools by their very nature are not conducive to social distancing, and special accommodations must be made to change that.”
Education Commissioner Miguel Cardona plainly stated during a CEA-sponsored webinar last Wednesday that “it’s highly unlikely we’ll come back in June and resume classes.”
Clearly, very little intrigue surrounds the probable announcement that Connecticut schools will remain shuttered through June.
What is intriguing, however, are the discussions about the long-term effects of the current shutdown on schools themselves. As Dr. Cardona told teachers during the webinar, they should not anticipate going back to the “old model” next fall: “Education will never be the same.”
Put simply, the remote-learning model currently in place, coupled with lingering safety questions, has sparked a flurry of predictions about how public education might look once schools re-open. Among the forecasts:
• Smaller Classes and Staggered Schedules: Social-distancing practices will require additional space in classrooms, so schools will split student bodies in half and put them on some sort of alternating schedule. “One group of kids might attend school on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday one week, then Tuesday and Thursday the following week,” according to an NPR report. “Others have discussed morning and afternoon shifts.”
• Continued Distance Learning: Adults have been earning online degrees for years now. Many public schools had already been experimenting with “blended learning” in which physical class sessions are reduced in number, supplemented by online lessons. COVID-19 has made such internet-dependent education a necessity – and this mode of teaching will not go away even when the virus does.
Education writer Emily Freitag explains that remote learning via computer goes hand-in-hand with the potential alternating school schedules: “Schools may have to go back to distance learning or reimagine a more complex hybrid model, with a portion of students in school and another portion at home for extended periods of time.”
• Additional Support Services: If COVID-19 has revealed anything about education, it’s that schools have become much more than just schools over the years. Public schools in America provide meals, mental-health counseling, social-emotional support, and many other necessities in addition to education.
“Now schools need to become a service, not a place,” writes Freitag. “Educators are rapidly trying to build grab-and-go social service programs for basic needs, connect with students and families virtually, and steward distance-learning experiences.”
Adds the NPR report, such services will have an even higher priority once kids return to school buildings due to the added stress of a new schedule and a new mode of learning, all in the midst of a public-health crisis. In short, “ameliorating this trauma will be at the core of [a school’s] mission.”
• Additional Changes: Other changes involve large-group events such as band concerts, assemblies, and athletic contests that might become small-group events or be canceled outright. Also, schools could have later starting times. And as the CEA’s Leake suggests, mandated protocols should require “the continual cleaning of classrooms, hallways, and bathrooms, as well as commonly shared areas and equipment.”
No doubt, change is on the way. But questions remain: How probable are these changes? How effective will they be? Indeed, will certain changes create more problems than they solve?
I’ve seen a few changes in 29 years of teaching, which I’ve described previously as “the pendulum effect” – an “innovation to improve education” is initiated, it goes away, and it comes back again at some point. Change for the sake of change, you might say.
The radical changes being discussed now are different; they’re not change for the sake of change. Still, we must view these proposals with circumspection before adopting them, whole hog.
For all of distance learning’s innovation and novelty, for instance, it’s no panacea. If anything, it can exacerbate education’s pre-existing challenges. Many families lack the technological resources, knowledge, or time to effectively support their children’s at-home schooling. Many students have special needs that simply cannot be met without consistent face-to-face interaction. And many students simply disappear when not required to show up personally in a school building. I’ve seen that phenomenon firsthand during the current remote-learning scenario.
This is not to say that these problems are insurmountable and that change is futile – especially when children’s well-being and safety are at stake. However, we must approach major modifications with caution and we must seek feedback.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
That means proposals should be debated openly and honestly. For instance, parents, kids, and teachers should be directly involved in the education subcommittee of the governor’s Reopen Connecticut Advisory Group. Failing that, we run the risk of creating a Frankenstein monster, turning schools into a patchwork of untested, conflicting initiatives. And that would indeed create more problems than are solved.
Barth Keck is an English teacher and assistant football coach who teaches courses in journalism, media literacy, and AP English Language & Composition at Haddam-Killingworth High School.
DISCLAIMER: The views, opinions, positions, or strategies expressed by the author are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or positions of CTNewsJunkie.com.
More COVID-19 Coverage

Connecticut To Get FEMA Funds for COVID Testing Sites
Connecticut will receive more than $2 million in federal emergency funding to pay for the operation of COVID-19 testing sites during a six-month period last year, the Federal Emergency Management Agency announced Monday. The roughly $2.15 million will come from FEMA’s public assistance grant program and will be used to reimburse state funds used to…
Keep reading
COVID Transmission Increases in CT
As of Friday afternoon, Connecticut’s test positivity rate was 13.71% and there were 323 residents hospitalized with the virus. On Thursday, the Department of Public Health reported that 158 of Connecticut’s 169 municipalities qualified for the state’s “red alert” distinction for COVID-19, which is triggered when a community records at least 15 daily cases per…
Keep reading
Connecticut At High, Medium Risk of COVID Transmission
Connecticut’s COVID-19 test positivity rating was 10.35% on Thursday and all eight Connecticut counties were in the medium yellow or high orange categories on the CDC’s community spread map. Those community maps, created by the CDC in February, are supposed to tell people to take preventative steps such as masking and testing. Hartford, Middlesex and…
Keep reading
Advocates Make 11th Hour Pitch For Compassionate Release
Hartford, CT — Advocates seeking compassionate release from prison during public health emergencies like COVID rallied at the state Capitol hours before they saw their legislation die without action in either chamber. At the rally on Wednesday, protestors and advocates were demanding action from legislators to pass a bill that addresses COVID in prisons. The…
Keep reading
Legislating During COVID-19
The legislative session ends in three days now, that’s shorter than the amount of time someone should quarantine under CDC standards if they have COVID-19, so how are lawmakers coping? Sen. Saud Anwar, D-South Windsor, started experiencing symptoms two weeks ago and tested positive for COVID-19. Luckily the session wasn’t scheduled until last Tuesday, but…
Keep reading
Study Shows Union Nursing Homes Had Lower Rates of COVID-19
A recent study published by Health Affairs found that unionized nursing homes had lower resident COVID-19 mortality rates. Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing home residents have accounted for roughly one of every six COVID-19 deaths in the United States. Nursing homes have also been very dangerous places for workers, with more than…
Keep reading
Senator Murphy Tests Positive For COVID
U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy announced on Twitter that he tested positive for COVID-19. “FYI after feeling mild symptoms overnight, I tested positive for COVID this morning. We’ve done the contact tracing and let people know. It’s a bummer, but I’m sure if I wasn’t fully vaccinated I would be feeling a lot worse. So remember…
Keep reading
COVID Cases Tick Back Up
Most of Gov. Ned Lamont’s executive orders, which were extended to April 15 by the legislature, have now expired just as Connecticut’s test positivity rate for COVID-19 is creeping back up and students at UConn are being asked to mask up again, starting today. According to the Department of Public Health, Connecticut recorded 3,939 positive…
Keep reading
House Green Lights Extension of COVID-19 Laws
The House gave final passage Wednesday to a package of four concepts that had been executive orders and are now law. Previously, the concepts were executive orders to address the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keep reading
Tong Tests Positive For COVID-19
Attorney General William Tong has tested positive for COVID-19. He is experiencing mild symptoms and quarantining at home.
Keep reading
Lieutenant Gov. Tests Positive For COVID-19, Days After Gov
Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz tested positive for the COVID-19 virus during a routine rapid test over the weekend, her chief staff said in a Monday morning statement. Bysiewicz’s results follow Gov. Ned Lamont, who tested positive late last week. “I have tested positive for COVID-19,” Bysiewicz wrote on Twitter. “Thanks to the vaccine and booster…
Keep reading
Lamont Tests Positive for COVID-19
Gov. Ned Lamont tested positive for COVID-19 Thursday. The results from two rapid tests were positive and he’s awaiting the results of a PCR test, according to this staff. The 68-year-old governor received his second booster exactly a week ago, but has made it through the first two years of the pandemic without contracting the…
Keep reading
New Initiative Allows Same Day COVID Testing And Treatment
Hundreds of pharmacies and federally qualified community health centers across Connecticut are now offering COVID testing and treatments to patients at the same time and place. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, these test-to-treat sites provide antiviral medication to hundreds of locations across the U.S, who then distribute them to patients…
Keep reading
YNHH Top Doc Boosts 2nd Boosters
If you’re eligible to get a second Covid-19 booster shot, go get it. Especially if you’re over 50 and have an underlying medical condition like diabetes that puts you at “high risk” of contracting a severe case of COVID. Read more from the New Haven Independent.
Keep reading
Federal COVID Funds To Limit Tax Relief In An Election Year
Like all states, Connecticut accepted billions of dollars from the federal government for COVID-19 relief, but that money limits how much the state can now consider cutting taxes. It’s bubbling up as a point of contention as lawmakers race to adjust the two-year state budget, which is currently experiencing a record surplus. Connecticut is expected…
Keep reading