

Arguably the most contentious part of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the individual mandate, requiring every American to secure healthcare coverage, appears to have made little difference since Congress removed the penalty last year.
Connecticut considered passing a state-level individual mandate both before the ACA and more recently as the ACA has been in peril. But the legislature decided not to pass it several times. It looks like they were right.
Implementation of the ACA in 2014 had made a massive difference in lowering the number of people without coverage. Connecticut’s uninsured rate dropped by 146,000 people between 2013 and 2018. But that’s because we took advantage of the ACA’s tools to expand coverage.
Connecticut was the first state to expand Medicaid to thousands more residents. Thousands more are getting federal subsidies to buy insurance through Access Health CT, our state health insurance exchange, including 30,254 new customers just last year. Also righting a massive injustice, under the ACA people with pre-existing conditions can’t be excluded from coverage.
All of these factors combined to expand coverage, but it’s not clear if many of the uninsured even knew that they were required to buy coverage when the individual mandate existed.
The penalty for not buying insurance was finally eliminated under President Donald Trump.
The ACA’s individual mandate was a response to theoretical concerns from economists and insurers. Insurers, of course, loved the idea that we would all be legally required to buy their product. Without a mandate, economists warned only less healthy people will buy in, raising premiums, causing a death spiral. But it turns out they were wrong.
When Congress removed the penalty, insurers warned that premiums would rise 5%, but in fact they’ve been stable and insurers are doing just fine. In fact, insurers are spending less of our premiums on medical care, only 75% nationally in the last quarter of 2019. Insurer profits on individual plans per person were $131.17 per month in that quarter, up from $9.90 in 2015. Monthly patient days in the hospital are even down a bit.
In Connecticut, we knew the economists were wrong. In 2008, Connecticut considered, and rejected, an individual mandate in SustiNet reforms. In 2018, responding to Congressional efforts to repeal the ACA, several states considered passing state-level individual mandates. Connecticut held a public hearing, but the mandate didn’t pass out of committee.
Mandates are no guarantee of compliance. Connecticut law requires that all drivers have auto insurance, but 9.4% are uninsured. https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-uninsured-motorists That rate has always been higher than our rate of healthcare uninsurance, both before and since the ACA.
Very few people are uninsured by choice – it’s an old myth that the uninsured can afford coverage, they just choose not to, and a law will make them buy it. The truth is that the vast majority of uninsured can’t afford to buy insurance. The ACA made coverage affordable for many more people and that’s why the uninsured rate fell.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
There are still problems with insurance in Connecticut. The worst problem is that it costs too much for individuals, families, businesses and government. Those costs fall especially hard on families without employer coverage and incomes just above the federal subsidy level who have to pay the full cost. But forcing them to buy unaffordable coverage solves nothing. The individual mandate doesn’t matter. Let’s move on to address the real reasons healthcare is so expensive.
Ellen Andrews, PhD, is the executive director of the CT Health Policy Project. Follow her on Twitter @CTHealthNotes.
DISCLAIMER: The views, opinions, positions, or strategies expressed by the author are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or positions of CTNewsJunkie.com.
More Health Care News & Analysis

AG’s Tackle Mental Health Parity
Attorneys General in Connecticut and Rhode Island threw their support Monday behind a coalition of mental health advocacy groups asking a federal appeals court to revisit a recent ruling giving insurance companies more flexibility to deny mental health claims.
Keep reading
Budget Green Lights Psychedelic Therapies
Buried in the budget Gov. Ned Lamont signed this week is a provision that would create a pilot program to allow Connecticut to be the first-in-the-nation to study the impact of psychedelic drugs like psilocybin and MDMA on patients with depression and PTSD. The budget now creates a pilot program within the Department of Mental…
Keep reading
Officials Highlight Effort To Boost Mental Health Services For Kids
At a Hartford-based community provider Wednesday, Gov. Ned Lamont and a handful of his agency commissioners highlighted the expected impact of more than $100 million in recently passed funding aimed at increasing behavioral health services for Connecticut children. The governor appeared at The Village for Families and Children, a recipient of new state funding included…
Keep reading
Democrats Turn Focus To Roe v. Wade
With the legislative session and the conventions in the rearview mirror, Democrats in Connecticut are turning their focus to the U.S. Senate and the upcoming vote to codify Roe v. Wade and the impact it could have on the 2022 Elections. U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy was on Fox News Sunday talking about the issue, which…
Keep reading
OP-ED | Policymakers Did Little to Lower Healthcare Costs This Session
Last year, Connecticut policymakers accomplished little to reduce the cost of healthcare, and those costs haven’t gotten any better since then. Incumbents will be asked what they did this year to provide some relief. Unfortunately, they have little to offer.
Keep reading
ANALYSIS | Will the 2022 Legislative Session Help or Hurt Democrats in the Fall?
The short but surprisingly productive 2022 session of the General Assembly is coming to a close this week. As Democrats race to pass bills, and Republicans do all they can to talk them to death, a question that has to be on the minds of a lot of legislators is what the session means, if…
Keep reading