
HARTFORD, CT —A federal appeals court sided Wednesday with Republican opponents of the Affordable Care Act, ruling that the individual mandate — zeroed out by Congress two years ago – is unconstitutional. But it didn’t throw out the entire law.
Two years ago, Congress removed the individual mandate through the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and that’s when Republican attorneys general from Texas and other states stepped in to challenge the Affordable Care Act in federal court.
“The individual mandate is unconstitutional because it can no longer be read as a tax, and there is no other constitutional provision that justifies this exercise of congressional power,” U.S. Circuit Judge Jennifer Elrod wrote for the majority.
The case is now being sent back to U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor in Texas for further analysis to determine if the entire ACA should fall too if the individual mandate is no longer valid.
Patricia Baker, president and CEO of the Connecticut Health Foundation, said the most important thing for everyone to remember at the moment is that “nothing changes.”
“The open enrollment period to buy health insurance for 2020 through Access Health CT, the state’s health insurance exchange, remains in effect, and federal financial aid is still available to help people pay for their coverage. The existing rules about coverage still apply,” Baker said.
Enrollment is still open through Jan. 15.
“While the ruling has no immediate effect, the way this case is ultimately resolved could be consequential,” Baker added. “ If the U.S. Supreme Court eventually overturns the Affordable Care Act, it would have significant effects on Connecticut residents.”
A 2017 report on the impact of the Affordable Care Act in Connecticut identified effects on nearly everyone in the state.
The report commissioned by the Connecticut Health Foundation and produced by the Urban Institute found more than 160,000 state residents – 5.4 percent of the population under 65 – had health care coverage because of the health law and would likely be uninsured without it.
The report also found 1.9 million people with employer-sponsored insurance gained zero-copay preventive care, protection from catastrophic costs because of the law’s ban on lifetime coverage limits, and immediate access to health insurance if they lose job-based coverage. The law also benefited residents covered by Medicare because it helped those individuals gain access to annual physicals, mammograms, colonoscopies, and other preventive services with no out-of-pocket charges, as well as significantly more coverage for prescription drug costs by reducing the “donut hole.”
Connecticut is in a better position than most states because individuals with state-regulated insurance wouldn’t lose coverage based on pre-existing conditions, but Connecticut doesn’t have the money to subsidize premiums or fund Medicaid expansion without the help of the federal government.
In Connecticut there are 2.21 million privately-insured residents. Of those, about 1.85 million get their insurance from large group plans, 131,000 have individual plans, and 235,000 people are covered under small group plans. The Insurance Department doesn’t regulate the plans of 1.85 million people in the large group market, where the terms of employee benefits are set by employers.
So of those 2.21 million privately-insured residents, the 366,000 with individual plans or those who are covered under small group plans are protected from losing coverage for pre-existing conditions, but the cost of that coverage could increase dramatically without protections of the ACA.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
Several months ago, U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy urged his Republican colleagues to start thinking about what would happen if the federal appeals court upholds the lower court ruling.
“What are the Republicans in the Senate going to do if Texas v. United States is decided for the Republican plaintiffs?” Murphy asked in September.
On Wednesday, Murphy tweeted: “Republicans own this.They owe Americans an explanation.”
More Health Care News & Analysis
Medical Examining Board Fines Doctor $10,000
The state Medical Examining Board on Tuesday fined an Oxford doctor $10,000 for fraudulently using another doctor’s name and Drug Enforcement Agency registration number to prescribe controlled substances to a family member.
Keep reading
Clinical Trials With Immunotherapy Drugs Are Source Of Hope And Challenges In Treating Aggressive Breast Cancer
Joshalyn Mills of Branford and Nancy Witz of Kensington had the best possible results after being treated in clinical trials with immunotherapy drugs for aggressive breast cancer: Their tumors were eliminated. But while there are dramatic successes with immunotherapy drugs, there are also many failures, and researchers are trying to find out why in hopes…
Keep reading
Coalition of Health Insurers Questions Viability of Connecticut Partnership Plan
Members of Connecticut’s Health Care Future, a coalition of health insurers, hospitals, and businesses, are questioning whether Connecticut lawmakers have done enough this year to protect teachers and municipal employees from increases in health insurance premiums. “Despite repeated bailouts from taxpayers, the Connecticut Partnership Plan continues to be a fiscal Titanic that demonstrates why government-controlled health…
Keep reading
AG’s Tackle Mental Health Parity
Attorneys General in Connecticut and Rhode Island threw their support Monday behind a coalition of mental health advocacy groups asking a federal appeals court to revisit a recent ruling giving insurance companies more flexibility to deny mental health claims.
Keep reading
Budget Green Lights Psychedelic Therapies
Buried in the budget Gov. Ned Lamont signed this week is a provision that would create a pilot program to allow Connecticut to be the first-in-the-nation to study the impact of psychedelic drugs like psilocybin and MDMA on patients with depression and PTSD. The budget now creates a pilot program within the Department of Mental…
Keep reading
Officials Highlight Effort To Boost Mental Health Services For Kids
At a Hartford-based community provider Wednesday, Gov. Ned Lamont and a handful of his agency commissioners highlighted the expected impact of more than $100 million in recently passed funding aimed at increasing behavioral health services for Connecticut children. The governor appeared at The Village for Families and Children, a recipient of new state funding included…
Keep reading