
Proving just how difficult it may be for a supermajority of the legislature to approve a spending cap, a 23-member commission that has been working on a recommendation for close to a year was unable to reach an agreement.
The Spending Cap Commission was able to find more consensus on the definition of inflation and personal income, but when it came to what spending should fall under the cap they couldn’t quite get there. The proposal failed by an 11-12 vote earlier this week.

William Cibes, former Office of Policy and Management secretary under Lowell P. Weicker and co-chair of the Spending Cap Commission, said despite their best efforts they were unable to reach agreement. He said one proposal would pick up votes, while other proposals would lose votes.
At the outset of Monday’s meeting, Cibes felt he would be able to find consensus for a proposal that phased in the unfunded liability in the pension system, but his hopes were dashed when Democratic members of the commission voted against the measure.
Sen. Rob Kane, R-Watertown, said moving more money outside the spending cap is not consistent with the promise made to Connecticut taxpayers 24 years ago. The proposal, which ultimately failed, would have resulted in an additional $635.9 million being exempted from the spending cap just next year.
That being said, Kane appreciated the phase-in of the unfunded pension liability.
Former state Rep. Patricia Widlitz, who co-chaired the commission, said she thinks the pension piece was the most important piece they were able to get across the finish line.
“We did come to some movement and agreement on that,” Widlitz said.
She said she wishes they could have come to agreement on the other issues raised by Republican lawmakers and business officials, but they just couldn’t get there.
“The major accomplishment is the pension piece,” Widlitz said.
Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport, said it’s possible that they would never reach consensus even if they continued to meet and discuss the issue. He said at this juncture there are still “so many question marks” that he was unable to vote for the final proposed definition of what qualifies as an expenditure.
Steinberg said it’s “purely a symbolic vote” because it doesn’t send a clear message to the legislature.
Sen. Joan Hartley, D-Waterbury, said she was conflicted because the additional $635.9 million that will fall outside the cap next year seems “counterintuitive” to what brought the group together in the first place. She also struggled with language that would exempt spending on distressed municipalities from the spending cap.
Hartley ended up voting against the proposal.
And even though they couldn’t reach an agreement, the legislature will receive a narrative of their agreements and disagreements on the various aspects of the spending cap.
“I regret we weren’t able to come to a conclusion,” Cibes said. “I think the proposal that were recommended could serve as a basis for action by the General Assembly.”
Sen. Michael McLachlan, R-Danbury, said he was unhappy they were unable to come to an agreement.
“I also am disappointed we haven’t accepted the fact that our work has to survive a supermajority in the legislature,” McLachlan said.
He said it will be a long fourth down to get it over the goal line.
The cap was instituted back in 1992 to quell anger over implementation of a state income tax in 1991. It is calculated by tying increases in state spending to either personal income growth or the rate of inflation. Over the past 24 years, lawmakers and governors have agreed to exceed the cap 8 times.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
In 2013, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy and lawmakers were unable to get the votes they needed to get around the spending cap, so they intercepted federal Medicaid reimbursements before they reached the general fund. The move essentially exempts them from being counted against the spending cap. Republicans opposed the move that year, calling it a “gimmick.
In 2015, the co-chairs of the Appropriations Committee unsuccessfully attempted to expand the definition of the spending cap without legislative approval or a legal opinion. Later that same year, Attorney General George Jepsen said the definition of the spending cap the lawmakers have been using has “no legal effect.”
More State Budget news

Stefanowski Talks Abortion, Employee Raises & Budget In First Press Conference
For a half-hour Wednesday, Bob Stefanowski stood outside the state Capitol and fielded questions on abortion rights and state employee raises in a sign the Republican candidate plans to run a more conventional campaign in this year’s rematch with Gov. Ned Lamont.
Keep reading
Lamont Signs The Budget
Alongside Democratic legislative leaders, Gov. Ned Lamont signed the $24 billion budget adjustment Monday that includes $600 million in tax relief. That’s more than they anticipated they would be able to offer Connecticut residents this Election year because revenue came in higher than expected, but it still creates about an $800 million deficit in 2024. …
Keep reading
ANALYSIS | It’s A Wrap: The Winners and Losers of the 2022 Session
It was a short legislative session, but the House and the Senate were able to move a lot of business this year, including the passage of a $24-billion budget with around $600 million in tax cuts.
Keep reading
Connecticut Acts To Help Its Lead-Poisoned Children
After decades of inertia, Connecticut is finally moving to help its thousands of lead-poisoned children and prevent thousands of other young children from being damaged by the widespread neurotoxin.
Keep reading
Bill Bolstering Contracting Oversight Board In Jeopardy After Lamont Administration Raises Concerns
It passed unanimously in the Senate, but a bill that would give the State Contracting Standards Board greater oversight over state contracting appeared stalled in the House Wednesday on the last day of session. “The governor and I have not talked about the bill,” House Speaker Matt Ritter said. “The commissioners have sent us a…
Keep reading
Senate Approves Tax Cuts, Sends $24B Budget to the Governor
The state Senate gave final approval late Tuesday to a $24 billion election year budget plan that includes around $600 million in tax relief while enabling the state to make an $3.5 billion payment on its unfunded pension debt. Senators voted 24-12 at around 10:30 p.m. to send the midterm budget adjustment to the desk…
Keep reading
House Green-Lights $24B Budget
On a party-line vote early Tuesday, the House passed a $24 billion budget adjustment package containing more than $600 million in tax cuts which Democrats heralded as “historic” and Republicans derided as temporary. Lawmakers voted 95 – 52 at around 12:20 a.m. to send the 673-page budget document to the Senate for consideration before the…
Keep reading
Budget Materials
The General Assembly is preparing to debate adjustments to the $24 billion state budget. Below are a few of the documents we’ve been provided as back-up materials. The budget, HB 5506. Town runs. Car tax impact on municipalities. Finance Committee Power Point.
Keep reading
Lawmakers May Vote for First Pay Increase in 20 Years
With legislative retirements mounting, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle were considering Monday raising the salaries of General Assembly members for the first time in more than two decades and indexing their pay in the future. During a morning press briefing, House Speaker Matt Ritter told reporters that funding for pay raises had been…
Keep reading
Amid Surging Revenue, House Prepares to Vote on Budget Adjustments
Connecticut’s House of Representatives was expected to vote Monday on a $24 billion budget adjustment package, buoyed by revised revenue predictions that exceeded expectations by more than $350 million. The revised consensus figures released Monday confirm the surge in revenues that enabled Gov. Ned Lamont and legislative Democrats to reach an agreement last week on…
Keep reading
Dems Detail Budget Deal With $500 Mil in Tax Cuts, Extension of Gas Tax Holiday
Legislative Democrats and Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration announced Wednesday the details of a $24.2 billion budget adjustment package, which they say provides around $500 million in tax relief including extending a gas tax holiday until December. Lamont and legislative leaders outlined the agreement during an afternoon press conference in the state Capitol building. Both chambers…
Keep reading
Health Care Workers Call for New Hires
After a record number of health care workers are expected to retire this year, health care staff called on Gov. Ned Lamont to commit to filling 1,000 vacant positions by August 1 of this year. A record 1,137 state workers who notified the state that they will retire this year comes at a moment of…
Keep reading
Senate Joins House And Votes To Give Raises, Bonuses To State Employees
The Senate gave final approval by a 22-13 vote on a plan to give unionized state workers a set of raises and bonuses. The plan, negotiated by Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration and a coalition of public sector labor unions, provides three years of 2.5% raises and step increases as well as a total of $3,500…
Keep reading
House Advances Labor Deal In Historic Vote
Lawmakers in Connecticut’s House of Representatives signed off on a plan to give state workers a set of raises and bonuses Thursday in a mostly partisan vote on a negotiated labor agreement. The House voted 96 to 52 in support of the deal with 1 Republican, Rep. Tom Delnicki of South Windsor, joining all Democrats…
Keep reading
Republicans Propose Last-Minute Tax Package
Legislative Republicans pitched a $1.2 billion tax relief plan Thursday which reduces state income, sales and gas taxes and proposes to join other states in suing the federal government to challenge restrictions on spending pandemic relief funds. House and Senate Republicans announced the plan during a state Capitol press conference Thursday morning. It cuts the…
Keep reading
The Budget Battle Begins To Take Shape
Tax collections have improved and pushed Connecticut’s budget surplus to $4 billion, but the state budget still relies heavily on federal funding and without it the state would end up running a “sizeable operating deficit.” The Office of Policy and Management told state Comptroller Natalie Braswell Wednesday that if not for the use of the…
Keep reading