Does our current tax structure reflect our values as a state? And how can we change our tax structure so that we get more of what we want — especially job growth?
We are now only a few days away from when state lawmakers will release their version of the budget for the next two years.
On Monday, the Appropriations Committee will release its plan for state spending, and a day or two later the Finance Committee will release its plan for how to pay for that spending.
The Democrats are being pressured hard by union leaders and other left-leaning special interest groups to raise the income tax. These groups complain there isn’t enough revenue in this state to pay for the things we need.
That is surprising given that Connecticut’s combined state and local tax burden is already third highest in the country. Somehow, collecting more taxes per person than 47 other states still isn’t enough.
New York and New Jersey come in first and second, so the prevailing wisdom seems to be that since we aren’t quite as bad as them, we have room to increase taxes.
That’s wrong on so many levels. First of all, have you looked at New Jersey lately? It’s a mess. We don’t want to be New Jersey. And New York has New York City, which attracts people even though it is a high tax zone because it has things to offer that other places don’t.
Plus, the tax rates are only part of the story. If you took into account that Connecticut taxes income more broadly than other states, our rates would actually look a lot higher.
This week, Joseph Henchman, vice president of the Tax Foundation and one of the leading experts on state tax policy, visited Connecticut. He worked recently with Gov. Andrew Cuomo to revise New York’s corporate tax system so that it is more pro-growth. Henchman is also working with leaders in Rhode Island to revise that state’s tax structure.
A soon-to-be-released Tax Foundation study called “Location Matters” compares the states according to their friendliness to certain kinds of businesses. It also compares how we treat existing businesses with how we would treat a new business coming into the state.
Connecticut, unsurprisingly — and sadly — does not fare well. According to the study, Connecticut is most friendly to manufacturing businesses, and least friendly to firms specializing in research and development. Connecticut was also unattractive to call centers, retail stores, and corporate headquarters.
What was also interesting about the study is that it shows how much more friendly Connecticut is to existing businesses than it is to new businesses.
That’s because we have a tax structure based on special-interest carve-outs. If you know the right people, or employ enough Connecticut residents, you can negotiate your tax rates down. This hurts small business owners the most, who are the least able to get these carve-outs. It also hurts new businesses just starting-up, or those moving into the state.
Right now we are playing defense with our tax code. Our governor has to call business leaders regularly to make sure they aren’t moving out of state, and to find enticements to make them stay. This would not be necessary if we had a pro-growth tax structure.
So, what we do about the predicament we find ourselves in? After listening to Henchman, and several other tax experts this week, I came away with a few thoughts on how we should think about the taxes we pay:
• What we tax and how we tax says something about what we value.
Henchman was asked what the ideal tax system looks like, or how he’d change Connecticut’s tax structure. While he had a few suggestions based on general tax principles, he said there is no single ideal tax system. That’s because a tax system should reflect the state it’s found in.
Our taxes tell the people and businesses who might be thinking about moving here something about our state. Are we sending the message we want to send?
And, more importantly, do our taxes reflect who we are — the people who already live here? If not, why not?
• When you tax something, you get less of it. Sometimes a little less, sometimes a lot less, depending on how much you tax it. That’s Econ 101.
This made me think of the current plan in the state legislature to tax low-wage jobs. We will end up with fewer of those jobs, which might sound good on the surface, but there are people — mostly young people — who depend on those jobs for income.
• Connecticut does not exist in a vacuum. We are competing for jobs and people with other states and with other countries.
Right now our taxes make us less competitive. Some would say the benefits we provide, and our strong education system, make us more competitive. That’s true to a point, but we are still losing people to other states where benefits are less generous and education systems are less robust, but the cost of living is lower.
• Connecticut’s current system of taxation is volatile — meaning we have large swings in the amount of taxes we take in from year to year. That’s because we’re so heavily reliant on what happens on Wall Street.
Comptroller Kevin Lembo is shepherding a bill through the legislature that would help smooth out our revenue spikes and troughs. Right now, lawmakers seem enthusiastic about it. Hopefully that enthusiasm continues.
• Connecticut’s tax system is unpredictable, and that is hurting us. From year to year, lawmakers keep changing what and how we tax. The state needs to restructure its taxes, and then leave things alone.
When we raised taxes by an enormous amount four years ago, that was supposed to make things better. Clearly it made things worse. Our recovery — even compared to other historically slow recoveries in our state — has been almost nonexistent.
How far are we away from another economic downturn? If we don’t fix our tax structure to improve our competitiveness, and in turn our economic growth, we face years of a slow or shrinking economy.
Lawmakers likely will raise taxes again this year. Just writing that sentence makes me queasy. They should not raise taxes, they should cut spending.
• Needs are infinite, or at least unquantifiable. So you cannot build a tax system based on needs. Rather, it should be based on values.
Obviously, when a state revises its taxes it needs to take into account the amount of revenue it wants to raise. But the state cannot meet every need that exists within its borders.
And it shouldn’t try. When a government steps in too heavily it replaces a civil society that would otherwise meet those needs.
When I think about what attracted me to Connecticut, I think of community. Our cities are small, our towns are quaint, our people are good. We are not our more muscle-bound neighbors to the northeast and southwest, where New York and Boston act like magnets, pulling much of the economic vitality toward themselves.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
But that’s ok. We need to stop trying to be New York and Boston, and instead we need to work out what being Connecticut means, and how to build on the intrinsic strengths that already exist here.
What is our “unique value proposition” — the elevator sales pitch for Connecticut? Before we overhaul our tax system — or even before we tweak it — we should consider what it is we want to project about Connecticut to the rest of the country and globally. And to ourselves.
Suzanne Bates is the policy director for the Yankee Institute for Public Policy. She lives in South Windsor with her family. Follow her on Twitter @suzebates.
DISCLAIMER: The views, opinions, positions, or strategies expressed by the author are theirs alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or positions of CTNewsJunkie.com.
More State Budget news

Stefanowski Talks Abortion, Employee Raises & Budget In First Press Conference
For a half-hour Wednesday, Bob Stefanowski stood outside the state Capitol and fielded questions on abortion rights and state employee raises in a sign the Republican candidate plans to run a more conventional campaign in this year’s rematch with Gov. Ned Lamont.
Keep reading
Lamont Signs The Budget
Alongside Democratic legislative leaders, Gov. Ned Lamont signed the $24 billion budget adjustment Monday that includes $600 million in tax relief. That’s more than they anticipated they would be able to offer Connecticut residents this Election year because revenue came in higher than expected, but it still creates about an $800 million deficit in 2024. …
Keep reading
ANALYSIS | It’s A Wrap: The Winners and Losers of the 2022 Session
It was a short legislative session, but the House and the Senate were able to move a lot of business this year, including the passage of a $24-billion budget with around $600 million in tax cuts.
Keep reading
Connecticut Acts To Help Its Lead-Poisoned Children
After decades of inertia, Connecticut is finally moving to help its thousands of lead-poisoned children and prevent thousands of other young children from being damaged by the widespread neurotoxin.
Keep reading
Bill Bolstering Contracting Oversight Board In Jeopardy After Lamont Administration Raises Concerns
It passed unanimously in the Senate, but a bill that would give the State Contracting Standards Board greater oversight over state contracting appeared stalled in the House Wednesday on the last day of session. “The governor and I have not talked about the bill,” House Speaker Matt Ritter said. “The commissioners have sent us a…
Keep reading
Senate Approves Tax Cuts, Sends $24B Budget to the Governor
The state Senate gave final approval late Tuesday to a $24 billion election year budget plan that includes around $600 million in tax relief while enabling the state to make an $3.5 billion payment on its unfunded pension debt. Senators voted 24-12 at around 10:30 p.m. to send the midterm budget adjustment to the desk…
Keep reading
House Green-Lights $24B Budget
On a party-line vote early Tuesday, the House passed a $24 billion budget adjustment package containing more than $600 million in tax cuts which Democrats heralded as “historic” and Republicans derided as temporary. Lawmakers voted 95 – 52 at around 12:20 a.m. to send the 673-page budget document to the Senate for consideration before the…
Keep reading
Budget Materials
The General Assembly is preparing to debate adjustments to the $24 billion state budget. Below are a few of the documents we’ve been provided as back-up materials. The budget, HB 5506. Town runs. Car tax impact on municipalities. Finance Committee Power Point.
Keep reading
Lawmakers May Vote for First Pay Increase in 20 Years
With legislative retirements mounting, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle were considering Monday raising the salaries of General Assembly members for the first time in more than two decades and indexing their pay in the future. During a morning press briefing, House Speaker Matt Ritter told reporters that funding for pay raises had been…
Keep reading
Amid Surging Revenue, House Prepares to Vote on Budget Adjustments
Connecticut’s House of Representatives was expected to vote Monday on a $24 billion budget adjustment package, buoyed by revised revenue predictions that exceeded expectations by more than $350 million. The revised consensus figures released Monday confirm the surge in revenues that enabled Gov. Ned Lamont and legislative Democrats to reach an agreement last week on…
Keep reading
Dems Detail Budget Deal With $500 Mil in Tax Cuts, Extension of Gas Tax Holiday
Legislative Democrats and Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration announced Wednesday the details of a $24.2 billion budget adjustment package, which they say provides around $500 million in tax relief including extending a gas tax holiday until December. Lamont and legislative leaders outlined the agreement during an afternoon press conference in the state Capitol building. Both chambers…
Keep reading
Health Care Workers Call for New Hires
After a record number of health care workers are expected to retire this year, health care staff called on Gov. Ned Lamont to commit to filling 1,000 vacant positions by August 1 of this year. A record 1,137 state workers who notified the state that they will retire this year comes at a moment of…
Keep reading
Senate Joins House And Votes To Give Raises, Bonuses To State Employees
The Senate gave final approval by a 22-13 vote on a plan to give unionized state workers a set of raises and bonuses. The plan, negotiated by Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration and a coalition of public sector labor unions, provides three years of 2.5% raises and step increases as well as a total of $3,500…
Keep reading
House Advances Labor Deal In Historic Vote
Lawmakers in Connecticut’s House of Representatives signed off on a plan to give state workers a set of raises and bonuses Thursday in a mostly partisan vote on a negotiated labor agreement. The House voted 96 to 52 in support of the deal with 1 Republican, Rep. Tom Delnicki of South Windsor, joining all Democrats…
Keep reading
Republicans Propose Last-Minute Tax Package
Legislative Republicans pitched a $1.2 billion tax relief plan Thursday which reduces state income, sales and gas taxes and proposes to join other states in suing the federal government to challenge restrictions on spending pandemic relief funds. House and Senate Republicans announced the plan during a state Capitol press conference Thursday morning. It cuts the…
Keep reading
The Budget Battle Begins To Take Shape
Tax collections have improved and pushed Connecticut’s budget surplus to $4 billion, but the state budget still relies heavily on federal funding and without it the state would end up running a “sizeable operating deficit.” The Office of Policy and Management told state Comptroller Natalie Braswell Wednesday that if not for the use of the…
Keep reading