Back on Nov. 5 before a federal judge agreed with two medical associations that UnitedHealthcare should stop dropping doctors from its Medicaid Advantage network, Attorney General George Jepsen asked federal regulators to “aggressively scrutinize” the decision.
Federal regulators at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services looked at the decision and concluded the insurance company’s networks were adequate.
“Our review of the anticipated provider network in Connecticut has not found any issues with network adequacy,” Douglas Edwards, associate regional administrator at CMS, wrote in the letter.
The review of the networks that CMS conducted were based on time, distance, and number standards. It did not take into account “the special needs of the disabled, elderly, low income, without personal transportation, and non-English speaking members,” Edwards wrote.
Jepsen called the decision disappointing.
“I have repeatedly pressed CMS to aggressively scrutinize UHC’s network to determine its adequacy, but have seen no evidence that it has done so,” he said in a statement.
“Remarkably, CMS concedes that it failed to consider the special needs of the disabled, elderly, low income, those without personal transportation and non-English speaking patients. In other words, CMS has approved UHC’s network without considering the needs of those who most need protection,” Jepsen said. “Nor has CMS independently verified that existing patients are being offered suitable alternatives for their terminated doctors — that is, substitute doctors with the appropriate expertise and capacity to accept new patients.”
Last week, a federal judge ruled in favor of the two medical associations that took UnitedHealthcare to court. The judge said the insurer needs to stop dropping doctors from its network and to reinstate the ones it planned to drop.
U.S. District Court Judge Stefan Underhill wrote that while UnitedHealthcare argued it was terminating the physicians without cause based on their contract, the company failed to “provide written notice of the ‘reasons for the action, including, if relevant, the standards and profiling data used to evaluate the physician and the number and mix of physicians needed by the MA organization.’ That did not occur here, in apparent breach of both Medicare regulations and the Physician Contract provisions regarding termination.”
UnitedHealthcare is appealing the decision to the 2nd Circuit Court.
Earlier this week UnitedHealthcare told the Hartford Courant it plans to proceed with network cuts to doctors who aren’t members of the associations.
The insurance company has declined to say how many physicians it intends to terminate from its network. According to the two medical associations, the insurance company was planning to drop 2,250 physicians from its network.
Federal regulators have also decided not to release termination numbers.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
“We are not releasing specific numbers regarding provider terminations at this time, but as noted above, we are investigating all complaints relating to the network changes,” Edwards wrote in his letter to Jepsen.
Meanwhile, medical associations across the country are filing court briefs in support of the Fairfield County Medical Association and Hartford County Medical Association’s complaint against UnitedHealthcare.
More Health Care News & Analysis
Medical Examining Board Fines Doctor $10,000
The state Medical Examining Board on Tuesday fined an Oxford doctor $10,000 for fraudulently using another doctor’s name and Drug Enforcement Agency registration number to prescribe controlled substances to a family member.
Keep reading
Clinical Trials With Immunotherapy Drugs Are Source Of Hope And Challenges In Treating Aggressive Breast Cancer
Joshalyn Mills of Branford and Nancy Witz of Kensington had the best possible results after being treated in clinical trials with immunotherapy drugs for aggressive breast cancer: Their tumors were eliminated. But while there are dramatic successes with immunotherapy drugs, there are also many failures, and researchers are trying to find out why in hopes…
Keep reading
Coalition of Health Insurers Questions Viability of Connecticut Partnership Plan
Members of Connecticut’s Health Care Future, a coalition of health insurers, hospitals, and businesses, are questioning whether Connecticut lawmakers have done enough this year to protect teachers and municipal employees from increases in health insurance premiums. “Despite repeated bailouts from taxpayers, the Connecticut Partnership Plan continues to be a fiscal Titanic that demonstrates why government-controlled health…
Keep reading
AG’s Tackle Mental Health Parity
Attorneys General in Connecticut and Rhode Island threw their support Monday behind a coalition of mental health advocacy groups asking a federal appeals court to revisit a recent ruling giving insurance companies more flexibility to deny mental health claims.
Keep reading
Budget Green Lights Psychedelic Therapies
Buried in the budget Gov. Ned Lamont signed this week is a provision that would create a pilot program to allow Connecticut to be the first-in-the-nation to study the impact of psychedelic drugs like psilocybin and MDMA on patients with depression and PTSD. The budget now creates a pilot program within the Department of Mental…
Keep reading
Officials Highlight Effort To Boost Mental Health Services For Kids
At a Hartford-based community provider Wednesday, Gov. Ned Lamont and a handful of his agency commissioners highlighted the expected impact of more than $100 million in recently passed funding aimed at increasing behavioral health services for Connecticut children. The governor appeared at The Village for Families and Children, a recipient of new state funding included…
Keep reading