If you’re one of the 55 percent of Connecticut residents who still buy their power from one of the legacy electricity companies, then Gov. Dannel P. Malloy wants to sell your power to the highest bidder to help fill the state’s coffers.
In order to collect $80 million in new revenue as part of his budget proposal, Malloy wants to auction off the power supplied by Connecticut Light & Power or United Illuminating to one of the state’s 40 or so “competitive” electricity suppliers that were allowed into the market after deregulation 13 years ago.
The idea has some consumers concerned.
Bryon Peterson, an AARP volunteer from Shelton, said he decided to buy his electricity from a competitive supplier and seven months later was asking to switch back to his legacy electricity company. He said he was getting charged 35 percent more than what his utility company, United Illuminating, was charging and his usage had not changed.
He said he later learned he was offered a teaser rate to get him signed up, but that rate expired a few months after he agreed to the switch. He said of the 40 suppliers available, about three or four have fixed rates and the rest offer variable rates.
“It was 35 percent higher than the standard offer so I switched back to the utility I used for 30 years,” Peterson said. “I’m not dumb because I suddenly became a senior.”
He said he just didn’t want to have to spend that much time analyzing his electric bill each month.
These retail or “competitive” suppliers of electricity have been around for 13 years now, but about only 45 percent of Connecticut’s residential customer base has made the switch.
Chris Kallaher, senior director of government and regulatory affairs for Direct Energy, said his company — which is one of the state’s competitive suppliers — would gladly bid on the 800,000 customers still using legacy electricity companies. It would save his company money on marketing to customers to try and get them to switch from the two utilities.
Sen. Kevin Witkos, R-Canton, said he was a skeptic himself, but he recently switched over and is satisfied with the savings. But he pointed out that Attorney General George Jepsen and Consumer Counsel Elin Katz have expressed concerned about the amount of consumer protections in the bill.
Kallaher said he’s in favor of transparency and would gladly add more.
“For example, when you get past the initial guaranteed price savings period, we think it would be absolutely appropriate to make sure it’s very prominent on the bill — not just what the price is you are now paying, but what the price was last month,” Kallaher told the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee Monday. “You occasionally worry about the unscrupulous marketer.”
He said there should also be an educational effort to let consumers know this is something to which they have to pay attention. He said the 55 percent of consumers not using a competitive suppliers need to be thinking about their energy consumption.
But Rep. Jonathan Steinberg, D-Westport, said the proposal makes him nervous because few details have been fleshed out and Connecticut would be “pioneering here without a lot of experience.”
It’s unclear if the legislation would default the 800,000 customers into a competitive supplier and leaves questions about how many would remain on standard service. The present proposal does force suppliers to stay 5 percent below the standard offer for at least a year, but according to Katz it does not dictate what would happen with rates in the second and third year of the proposal.
“Coupled with the possibility of a penalty provision to leave the contract, as just discussed, this proposal may force customers into a Hobson’s Choice of either accepting the risk of a high electric price for the second and third years or paying a large one-time penalty,” Katz said. “Obviously, the fact that this proposal would allow this presumably unintended result warrants some adjustment to the language.”
Barbara Alexander, a consumer affairs consultant for AARP, told the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee on Monday that the budget language is silent on whether customers would be charged a fee for leaving a competitive supplier who won their business at auction.
“While supporters claim that a customer can choose to return to the standard plan or another service after the switch, there is no assurance that this so-called right won’t come at a high cost,” Alexander said. Like Katz and Jepsen, Alexander worries that suppliers will have complete discretion to change prices, establish monthly variable prices, and change other contract terms without the customer’s affirmative consent.
Kallaher said the consumer protections are already in the market and he’s happy to talk about adding more, but he doesn’t think it should move the state away from being fully competitive.
He said every day people buy things like gasoline, which is essentially purchased on the spot market.
“If their car runs out of gas there is not a state regulated gasoline utility that comes to their house and fills their car up,” Kallaher said. “They make decisions every day about how to spend their gasoline dollars and who they want to buy it from.”
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
Jepsen and Katz believe customer choice requires that customers must be allowed to choose a competitive supplier other than the winning auction bidder. They also believe like AARP that the standard offer needs to remain to act as a sort of benchmark.
Kallaher doesn’t believe the utility needs to be in the business in order to protect customers. He believes the market will work itself out even if there is no standard offer. He said there is no “standard” offer for the price of food. The market operates without those types of regulations.
He said the 45 percent of customers who have made the switch are largely happy with the competitiveness of the market. He said 95 percent of the customers his company deals with don’t return to the public utilities when they drop his company — they go to other competitive suppliers.
More State Budget news

Stefanowski Talks Abortion, Employee Raises & Budget In First Press Conference
For a half-hour Wednesday, Bob Stefanowski stood outside the state Capitol and fielded questions on abortion rights and state employee raises in a sign the Republican candidate plans to run a more conventional campaign in this year’s rematch with Gov. Ned Lamont.
Keep reading
Lamont Signs The Budget
Alongside Democratic legislative leaders, Gov. Ned Lamont signed the $24 billion budget adjustment Monday that includes $600 million in tax relief. That’s more than they anticipated they would be able to offer Connecticut residents this Election year because revenue came in higher than expected, but it still creates about an $800 million deficit in 2024. …
Keep reading
ANALYSIS | It’s A Wrap: The Winners and Losers of the 2022 Session
It was a short legislative session, but the House and the Senate were able to move a lot of business this year, including the passage of a $24-billion budget with around $600 million in tax cuts.
Keep reading
Connecticut Acts To Help Its Lead-Poisoned Children
After decades of inertia, Connecticut is finally moving to help its thousands of lead-poisoned children and prevent thousands of other young children from being damaged by the widespread neurotoxin.
Keep reading
Bill Bolstering Contracting Oversight Board In Jeopardy After Lamont Administration Raises Concerns
It passed unanimously in the Senate, but a bill that would give the State Contracting Standards Board greater oversight over state contracting appeared stalled in the House Wednesday on the last day of session. “The governor and I have not talked about the bill,” House Speaker Matt Ritter said. “The commissioners have sent us a…
Keep reading
Senate Approves Tax Cuts, Sends $24B Budget to the Governor
The state Senate gave final approval late Tuesday to a $24 billion election year budget plan that includes around $600 million in tax relief while enabling the state to make an $3.5 billion payment on its unfunded pension debt. Senators voted 24-12 at around 10:30 p.m. to send the midterm budget adjustment to the desk…
Keep reading
House Green-Lights $24B Budget
On a party-line vote early Tuesday, the House passed a $24 billion budget adjustment package containing more than $600 million in tax cuts which Democrats heralded as “historic” and Republicans derided as temporary. Lawmakers voted 95 – 52 at around 12:20 a.m. to send the 673-page budget document to the Senate for consideration before the…
Keep reading
Budget Materials
The General Assembly is preparing to debate adjustments to the $24 billion state budget. Below are a few of the documents we’ve been provided as back-up materials. The budget, HB 5506. Town runs. Car tax impact on municipalities. Finance Committee Power Point.
Keep reading
Lawmakers May Vote for First Pay Increase in 20 Years
With legislative retirements mounting, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle were considering Monday raising the salaries of General Assembly members for the first time in more than two decades and indexing their pay in the future. During a morning press briefing, House Speaker Matt Ritter told reporters that funding for pay raises had been…
Keep reading
Amid Surging Revenue, House Prepares to Vote on Budget Adjustments
Connecticut’s House of Representatives was expected to vote Monday on a $24 billion budget adjustment package, buoyed by revised revenue predictions that exceeded expectations by more than $350 million. The revised consensus figures released Monday confirm the surge in revenues that enabled Gov. Ned Lamont and legislative Democrats to reach an agreement last week on…
Keep reading
Dems Detail Budget Deal With $500 Mil in Tax Cuts, Extension of Gas Tax Holiday
Legislative Democrats and Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration announced Wednesday the details of a $24.2 billion budget adjustment package, which they say provides around $500 million in tax relief including extending a gas tax holiday until December. Lamont and legislative leaders outlined the agreement during an afternoon press conference in the state Capitol building. Both chambers…
Keep reading
Health Care Workers Call for New Hires
After a record number of health care workers are expected to retire this year, health care staff called on Gov. Ned Lamont to commit to filling 1,000 vacant positions by August 1 of this year. A record 1,137 state workers who notified the state that they will retire this year comes at a moment of…
Keep reading
Senate Joins House And Votes To Give Raises, Bonuses To State Employees
The Senate gave final approval by a 22-13 vote on a plan to give unionized state workers a set of raises and bonuses. The plan, negotiated by Gov. Ned Lamont’s administration and a coalition of public sector labor unions, provides three years of 2.5% raises and step increases as well as a total of $3,500…
Keep reading
House Advances Labor Deal In Historic Vote
Lawmakers in Connecticut’s House of Representatives signed off on a plan to give state workers a set of raises and bonuses Thursday in a mostly partisan vote on a negotiated labor agreement. The House voted 96 to 52 in support of the deal with 1 Republican, Rep. Tom Delnicki of South Windsor, joining all Democrats…
Keep reading
Republicans Propose Last-Minute Tax Package
Legislative Republicans pitched a $1.2 billion tax relief plan Thursday which reduces state income, sales and gas taxes and proposes to join other states in suing the federal government to challenge restrictions on spending pandemic relief funds. House and Senate Republicans announced the plan during a state Capitol press conference Thursday morning. It cuts the…
Keep reading
The Budget Battle Begins To Take Shape
Tax collections have improved and pushed Connecticut’s budget surplus to $4 billion, but the state budget still relies heavily on federal funding and without it the state would end up running a “sizeable operating deficit.” The Office of Policy and Management told state Comptroller Natalie Braswell Wednesday that if not for the use of the…
Keep reading