Gov. Dannel P. Malloy called Thursday for a number of specific changes to the state’s firearm regulations. The move pre-empted any consensus recommendations from the legislature’s bipartisan Super Committee and the task force he created, but which was not working fast enough, according to the governor.
The governor offered sharp criticisms for the pace of legislative action earlier this week but toned down his rhetoric in a Thursday morning press release. Still, he urged quick action by lawmakers to pass his stricter gun proposals.
“Despite the strong leadership and goodwill in Connecticut’s House and Senate, we run a risk of letting this critical moment in history pass us by,” he said Thursday at a forum on gun violence in Danbury. “None of us want that to happen, and none of us should let it happen.”
Malloy’s proposals contain many of the ideas he has referred to as “common sense” in the days since the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
The governor has recommended banning ammunition magazines that carry more than 10 rounds, strengthening the state’s assault weapons prohibition, and making background checks universal for anyone purchasing a firearm.
“I am proposing that we change the definition of assault weapon to any semiautomatic that has at least one military characteristic, and ban the sale of these weapons in our state,” Malloy said. Currently a weapon must have two characteristics of a military firearm to be considered an assault weapon.
Under Malloy’s redefined assault weapons ban, the AR-15 would be prohibited from further sale. The AR-15 is the popular semi-automatic rifle used by the shooter in the mass murder at Sandy Hook.
People who purchased the weapon before the law is enacted would be permitted to keep it, but would be required to register it with State Police to get a certificate of possession. If they choose to sell the gun it would need to be sold to a licensed firearms dealer or out of state.
Malloy’s proposal to make background checks universal also expands the number of crimes that would make someone ineligible to purchase a gun. It would include any violation of the law involving a firearm or the use or threat of force. But it also would include non-violent crimes like operating a car under the influence or possession of a controlled substance within the last five years. Gun owners convicted of those crimes would have their firearms revoked.
The governor also recommended increasing enforcement of the gun regulations already on the books in Connecticut, as well as promoting safer weapon storage by gun owners.
“We need to expand laws around gun storage so that these weapons don’t fall into the hands of people who shouldn’t have them,” he said. “Gun owners have a responsibility to store their weapons safely, and should be held accountable if a person is injured because of an improperly stored weapon.”
Malloy’s recent call for immediate action on gun control measures represents a departure from his approach when he commissioned his post-Newtown task force. In his charge to the Sandy Hook Commission, the governor told the group he would attempt to shield them from pressure to rush their recommendations.
“I’m not going to put you under any pressure. In fact, I’ll protect you from that pressure, should that be required. On the other hand, I think you all need to be mindful that the legislature is in session and some of the things you will undoubtedly recommend will require legislation,” he said.
Senate Minority Leader John McKinney said he did not know why Malloy had changed his approach to gun control proposals.
Support authentic, locally owned and operated public service journalism!
“I could speculate. He’s got the vice president in town. He doesn’t want to be seen as being upstaged by other governors like [New York Gov. Andrew] Cuomo . . . Does he want to deflect attention away from a horrible budget he’s proposed? Maybe all of that’s true,” he said.
Whatever the governor’s reasoning, McKinney said Malloy’s proposals are among the things the legislative task force is considering and did little to add to the process.
“We’re going to continue to work as a legislature in a bipartisan fashion. We’ll have a package. We’ll have a vote. And we’ll put it on his desk,” he said.
Related

OP-ED | Students Need To Feel Safe
Since the Oxford High School shooting in Michigan, thousands of students in Connecticut have been terrorized by threats of violence in school, leading to lockdowns, school closures and widespread, student absences across the state.
Keep reading
Sandy Hook Families Say Remington Bankruptcy An Attempt To Avoid Lawsuit
The families of nine victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook school shootings are viewing Tuesday’s bankruptcy filing by Remington Arms Co. as an attempt to shield the company from their pending lawsuit in Connecticut Superior Court. The families are suing the company which manufactured the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting that killed 20 children…
Keep reading
Best Way To Spend $25M to Curb Gun Violence Discussed
WEST HAVEN, CT – How to most effectively use new federal funding to attack three areas of gun violence in Connecticut and nationally brought advocates to a weekend forum at the University of New Haven. U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro joined community leaders, law enforcement officials and healthcare providers to brainstorm leveraging the money to address…
Keep reading
Lamont Comes To Guilford To Tout Passage of Safe Gun Storage Law
GUILFORD, CT — Even though he’s already signed gun safe storage legislation, Gov. Ned Lamont felt it was important to come to Guilford on Thursday to recognize those who fought so hard to make the law reality. “Ethan’s Law” — which would require all firearms, loaded and unloaded, to be safely stored in homes occupied…
Keep readingBlumenthal, Murphy Seek Repeal of Law Shielding Gun Industry From Consumer Negligence Lawsuits
WASHINGTON — U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy have introduced legislation to rescind a 2005 law that has blocked most negligence and product liability cases from being filed against gun manufacturers, distributors and dealers in state or federal courts. The threat of negligence and product liability lawsuits will provide “a powerful incentive” for safer…
Keep reading
Murphy Continues Call for Gun Safety Votes
WASHINGTON — U.S. Senator Chris Murphy is continuing to push Senate Republican leaders to debate universal background-check legislation that passed the House nearly 100 days ago. The Connecticut Democrat who has championed gun safety legislation since the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in December 2012, spoke on the Senate floor and at a press conference…
Keep reading
Winners And Losers of the 2019 Legislative Session
HARTFORD, CT — The regular General Assembly session is over so it’s time to take a look back at some of the big winners and losers of a session highlighted by the inauguration of a new governor and a legislature with a strong Democratic bent. That Democratic majority helped carry through some party priorities to…
Keep reading
Ethan’s Law On Its Way To Governor’s Desk
HARTFORD, CT —(Updated 7:15 p.m.)“Ethan’s Law” – which would require all firearms, loaded and unloaded, to be safely stored in homes occupied by minors under 18 years of age – easily passed the Senate Thursday with bipartisan support. Only two Republicans, Sens. Rob Sampson of Wolcott and John Kissel of Enfield, voted against the bill.…
Keep reading
‘Ethan’s Law’ Introduced In Congress
WASHINGTON – Connecticut lawmakers announced Tuesday that they have introduced a federal version of “Ethan’s Law” in the House and Senate modeled after legislation nearing passage in the Connecticut to require gun owners to safely store their weapons away from children. Mike and Kristin Song of Guilford, whose son Ethan was killed by an accidental…
Keep reading
House Passes Gun Storage Law with Bipartisan Support
HARTFORD, CT — “Ethan’s Law” — which would require all firearms, loaded and unloaded, to be safely stored in homes occupied by minors under 18 years of age — easily passed the House on Tuesday with bipartisan support. The bill, which passed by a 127-16 vote, would allow prosecutors to criminally charge the owner of…
Keep reading